search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
PHARMACEUTICAL CARE


about an iterative work programme across all pharmacy environments.


John Macgill (JM): One access to information issue is around access by pharmacists in the community to patients’ Emergency Care Summary records. How close are we to having Scotland-wide access?


AS: We have made some progress on this. Several important information governance pieces of work needed to be put in place. Work has now been completed to create a Scottish Code of Practice between NHS Boards and GP practices to promote the safe sharing of information in accordance with the Data Protection Act. This provides a framework which can now be taken forward and used with other professional groupings. And while this governance work was being done, a couple of NHS boards have been testing access not just to the Emergency Care Summary but also to the Key Information Summary and discharge information through the use of clinical portals. NHS Tayside, in particular, has run a pilot for a couple of years and shown the benefit for community pharmacists, particularly over weekends and public holidays when NHS24 is also likely to be under the most pressure, and also, importantly, the benefits for patients and the public. Whilst the pharmacy profession is clear on the benefits, it is equally important to make sure that the profession takes the public with them and that people know that pharmacists will be using that information safely and responsibly. There is also progress being made, through the ePharmacy Programme to support the sharing of information on admission and discharge from hospital, as is being demonstrated in Forth Valley, Grampian and Glasgow, where the pharmacy care record is part of the core IT infrastructure, giving the hospital pharmacist a look-up facility and, equally, their community pharmacy colleagues getting information from hospital colleagues when the patient is discharged.


Ultimately, I would like to see a universal record allowing all members of the health and social care multidisciplinary team to have access to the information they need; and for that record to belong to the patient.


JM: The Government’s Achieving Excellence strategy for pharmacy was published last year and then the GP contract came along, which overlaps


8 - SCOTTISH PHARMACIST


but was written primarily from the perspective of doctors. How do they fit together?


AS: What is important for all professions involved in multidisciplinary teams is to think about what is good for patients, and what is good for patients will ultimately be good for the professions. The GP contract recognises the increasing role of pharmacists and pharmacy technicians in general practice settings. I think there are lots of opportunities around playing to the profession’s strengths and from new approaches, such as community pharmacists providing sessional work in GP practices with all the benefits that brings of cross-fertilisation of ideas and best practice.


‘Primary Care Transformation’ is now moving into an implementation phase. In Scotland we’ve always been lucky to have a Director of Pharmacy in each NHS board with


considered as being under General Medical Services and could only be provided by GP practices. Now, under the new contract, NHS boards will be looking at different ways of providing vaccination programmes and identifying the best people to deliver them. At the same time, if aspects of the vaccination programme were to shift to community pharmacy, under the current Patient Group Direction regulations, it is community pharmacists themselves who are identified as the people who would administer vaccines. Personally, I question whether that is the best use of community pharmacists’ time, skills and expertise. I’m really keen to work with the UK Government to re-examine PGDs to allow community pharmacy support staff, working within the right framework with the right training and oversight, to administer vaccinations. Pharmacists’ skills would, I believe, be much better employed in dealing with


‘WHAT IS IMPORTANT FOR ALL PROFESSIONS INVOLVED IN MULTIDISCIPLINARY TEAMS IS TO THINK ABOUT WHAT IS GOOD FOR PATIENTS, AND WHAT IS GOOD FOR PATIENTS WILL ULTIMATELY BE GOOD FOR THE PROFESSIONS.’


an oversight role. As we introduce the pharmacotherapy service, the Directors of Pharmacy are there to help ensure an integrated approach to delivering the service. Good policy-making never takes place in isolation from stakeholders and so we have established a Pharmacotherapy Service Implementation Group with representation from all the Boards and other stakeholders to provide oversight and support local implementation in a sustainable way.


JM: Responsibility for vaccination was removed from GPs in the new GP contract. How straight forward would it be to transfer that work to pharmacists?


AS: The legislation has now been updated to allow others to provide vaccination services; previously it was


more complex and relevant tasks such as addressing why 50 per cent of patients don’t take their medicines as intended, the adverse events some patients experience with some medicines, and providing polypharmacy and medication reviews. So, while I am ambitious about what the pharmacy profession does, we also need to make sure we are playing to our strengths and those of the entire pharmacy team.


JM: You’ve been a professor in the Pharmacy School at Robert Gordon University. What are your thoughts about what’s in store for future pharmacists, and how we train them to meet the challenges?


AS: I am really passionate about the education and training of pharmacists from undergraduate level all the way


through their careers. One of the crucial things is to understand the ambitions of young pharmacists and ensure that their voices are heard in the design of the strategies for the profession of the future.


One of the important developments for pharmacy education in the next few years will be the move to an integrated five-year Masters programme instead of the current four years undergraduate degree followed by one-year of preregistration training. The aim is to integrate these because we know that educationally this is a better way of consolidating students’ learning and to realise the benefits of much more practice- based collaborative learning in the workplace. If you look at nursing and medicine, students undertake significant periods of experiential learning, applying their learning in practice. Implementation groups have been established with representation from the NHS, CPS, students, the universities and the General Pharmaceutical Council, and we have started to look at the admission process, programme development, governance arrangements and a funding structure to support this. Many of the building blocks, such as existing governance structures and developments on a modular pre- registration year, are in place already so we’re not starting from scratch on this and we can also learn from the other professions.


JM: At the end of the five years, will these graduates also be fully-fledged independent prescribers?


AS: The regulator has given a strong indication that they would consider a model where the underpinning educational content for independent prescribing could take place as part of a five-year integrated programme. The newly qualified pharmacist could then work for a period of time building their experience, in a similar way to the foundation programme that supports newly qualified doctors, possibly starting as supplementary prescribers and moving to independent prescribing once they can demonstrate that they have sufficient experience and competence.


There is an increasing expectation of what our profession can deliver and it’s both very exciting and a privilege to play a part in realising the ambitions of both current and future generations of pharmacists. •


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48