search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
AAC


GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS


Half-cent sales tax to fund highways, roads is hardly a long-term plan


dedicated for road funding last year. Our counties have utilized this money to improve roads all across the state. County roads are vital for Arkansas’ diverse economy, particularly for farmers transporting product to market. Additionally, businesses and large industries that employ the great citizens of this state depend on safe and reliable county roads to earn a good living. At the beginning of the year, I was asked to speak before the


F


Mississippi Association of Supervisors (MAS), which is the equiv- alent to the Association of Arkansas Counties. Prior to the state legislative session, MAS hosts a mid-winter conference focusing on legislative matters. Infrastructure funding seems to be priority for every state. MAS wanted to hear what Arkansas has done to fund the highway system, county roads and city streets. In 2009, the Arkansas Legislature created the Blue Ribbon Committee on Highway Finance. Tis 19-member, independent panel was comprised of elected officials, business leaders, and civ- ic leaders from around the state. Te committee’s goal was to de- velop recommendations that could be considered by the General Assembly to help address Arkansas’ highway funding shortfall. During the 2011 legislative session, the Arkansas General Assembly referred to voters a proposed Constitutional Amend- ment to levy a temporary, 10-year, half-cent sales tax increase to fund highway improvements. What became Issue No. 1 on the November 2012 ballot was one of the Blue Ribbon Committee recommendations. Because an independent panel came up with the idea, and the voters would ultimately decide the outcome, the strongly anti-tax legislature was not much more than a pass- through entity in this process. Te legislature did not actually propose the tax increase, nor did it have to vote on the proposal’s merits. Te body let the people decide, and the measure passed with 58 percent voting in favor and 42 percent opposed. While driving to Jackson, Miss., I did not notice any orange


barrels — except for those surrounding the burst water lines in downtown. I quickly realized Mississippi needs a lot more than a half-cent to fix its deteriorating roads. Mississippi has dug itself in a hole by not allocating adequate funding for its road


orty million dollars is a good chunk of change. You may be wondering why I’m throwing out that num- ber. I’m throwing it out because that is the amount of money counties received from the half-cent sales tax


system. I would argue that if you ask Joe the Plumber to list the top three things the government is responsible for, roads would be in that top three. Most lawmakers I talk to agree we need more money for roads in Ar- kansas. Te debate is how that can be accomplished. Te legislature always has ideas on how it can appropriate more cash to infrastructure. However, legislators have not been able to reach an agreement over the last couple of sessions on how to increase funding for roads. Tis column is not meant to lobby for additional funding for


Josh Curtis


Governmental Affairs Director


roads in Arkansas, though I might get in trouble by a few county judges for saying that. I simply want to make readers aware the money generated by the sales tax sunsets in 2022. Tat means counties will no longer receive that $40 million a year it currently receives. On its agenda, MAS called my presentation, “Long- Term Infrastructure Plan: Arkansas Success Story.” I would ar- gue they got the success story part right in this title because the maintenance program for county roads have been improved. But the more I think about this program, it’s not a long-term plan. Generally you can call a 10-year plan a long-term plan. However, when you are halfway through the program, you start to realize what happens when the money goes away. One thing Arkansas has going for it is the partnership between


the Arkansas Department of Transportation (ArDOT), cities and counties. All dedicated road money is split 70/15/15 — 70 per- cent going to ArDOT, 15 percent to the counties, and 15 percent to the cities. Tis formula works, and we are fortunate that each entity agrees with this formula. So when the half-cent sales tax expires, the cities also stand to lose $40 million a year. ArDOT will lose close to $200 million a year. Maintaining the highway and road system is expensive, but going without this revenue for a few years would make the next “long-term plan” even more expensive. Everyone has to put oil in his or her car; it’s a maintenance expense. If you go without oil and stop doing the required maintenance, that small expense will turn into a catastrophic expense. It’s the same for our highway and road system.


www.arcounties.org 16 COUNTY LINES, WINTER 2018


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52