Dr. Michael Spencer, Dean, School of Engineering, Morgan State University USBE Magazine’s Leading Voices
have a clear view of innovation and the future of work in the Digital Era. In this issue are, Morgan State University’s Dr. Michael Spencer, one of the most active engineering deans in the growth of compound semiconductors, microwave devices, power conversion devices, and solar cells; Howard University’s Gary Harris, associate provost for research and graduate studies, professor of electrical engineering, and director of the Howard Nanoscale Science and Engineering Facility | Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering College of Engineering, Architecture & Computer Sciences; and Innovation Expert Jem Pagan.
Leading Voices Contributing Editors .........................
Dr. Michael Spencer Dean
School of Engineering Morgan State University
Dr. Gary Harris Professor
Engineering Department Howard University
Jem Pagán
Chief Technology Offi cer Flatiron Strategies
been the guiding principle for the microelectronic industry for over 60 years. It simply states that every few years there will be a doubling in the number of transistors on an integrated circuit for a given area. This doubling is not only physical but also implies an increased performance enabled by a higher operation frequency and increased functionality. The increase in Moore’s Law has meant an increase in performance and a decrease in overall cost. While it costs more marginally to make these more densely packed chips, the number of chips per unit area increases dramatically, thereby driving the cost down due to increased performance and innovation in creating newer devices and forms of technology. For over 60 years, Moore’s Law
The End of Moore’s Law M
oore’s Law, named after Intel founder Gordon Moore, has
dollars trying to refi ne the technologies for CMOS transistors. To their chagrin, no replacements have been discovered. The end of Moore’s Law means that
semiconductor companies can no longer expect to continue to see tremendous increase in profi tability year by year. They now have to be satisfi ed with much more modest growth and consider how existing technologies can be better utilized outside of new, more densely integrated circuits. The overriding drive for companies now is determining how to investigate the increased functionality of integrated circuits with the realization that they are not going to be able to make anything much vaster or newer due to reaching the limits of what nature allows, at least with standard CMOS technology. This problem, resulting from the
has driven the semiconductor industry. Semiconductors, principally silicone and silicone material, have been the steel of the 20th century. The silicone microelectronic industry is a multi-trillion-dollar industry and has continually grown over the decades. Each year, semiconductor research professionals try to anticipate upcoming trends as they proceed down the trail of Moore’s Law. Sadly, we now have made devices so small that we have practically reached the limit of what is possible. Those limits are set by the very dimensions of atoms themselves. Right now, the smallest dimension on a microelectronic device is no more than 10 to 20 atomic diameters. Although we have the technology to make things smaller, the underlying physics of complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) transistors no longer work at these small dimensions. The fact that it is virtually impossible to have things any more tightly fi t together due to various considerations, most of those regarding heat, has meant that Moore’s Law has begun to come to an end. That has caused tremendous consternation in the semiconductor industry. The industry has spent millions of
76 USBE&IT | CONFERENCE ISSUE 2018
pending ineffi cacy of Moore’s Law, has been realized for only the last few years. The industry is still struggling to see if there are still work-arounds. To date, nothing has presented itself. What can be safely assumed is that new advances will not exist in hardware technology; rather, they will most likely continue to be created in software technology and in making transistors more fl exible to accommodate wearable electronics for the Internet of Things. In this arena, there’s a great
rethinking of what the role of physical electronics will be in the future. It underscores the increasing importance of computational careers and engineering. We who are in physical electronics arenas are asking ourselves if there will be a robust industry to employ recent doctoral graduates and what will drive undergraduate training in areas of device manufacturing. As with other industries, the end of Moore’s Law is creating a new slant on what the future is going to look like and how it will function. S
www.blackengineer.com
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116
