18 VIEWS
VIEW POINT
Dr Andy Lewry of BRE Global outlines his strategy for better-integrated design and build processes that use modelling to address the ‘Performance Gap’
s we drive the performance of our building stock, it is becoming clear that one of the key challenges we must address is narrowing the gap between design and actual performance. The industry needs support to ensure we use more accurate modelling and data to understand how the building will perform in operation. Without this the gap in performance can be as big as 200-450 per cent greater than predicted. With project costs squeezed and ‘value engineered’, all too often performance suffers. Allowing design teams more time to spend on modelling and considering how the building will be used by its occupants, rather than imposing ‘default values’ and specifica- tion, we will go some of the way to eliminating this performance gap.
A Understanding the gap
When a building is managed effectively, property value is maximised. A high performing building will ultimately generate maximum profit via high and continuous rental income, low operating and mainte- nance costs and low depreciation. Modelling tools are used for compliance, which means they use standard default values for the building design. All the operational plant which controls the building is then set at these ‘standardised driving’ conditions and the occupancy density (i.e people versus square metres) is based on industry averages. As a result these standard default values
WWW.ARCHITECTSDATAFILE.CO.UK
The performance gap has two components: the compliance gap and the actual performance gap. The compliance gap is estimated at 50-70 per cent but can be solved by more realistic modelling that mirrors the conditions more accurately. The reasons for the second and larger actual performance gap are generally unknown. Speculation has led to assumption in this regard, but there is little in the way of hard evidence.
underestimate the usage by up to 100 per cent. Software is used to meet Building Regulations and energy performance certifi- cates, as well as being used for ranking rather than the operation of the building. When you pass the design stage, it’s essential that real numbers are inputted and this can be done via modelling techniques such as the Green Deal software developed by BRE. This allows users to tailor the usage of the build- ing to match real operating conditions and to work out what it should and shouldn’t be. But from that point onwards it much depends on how well the building is commis- sioned; what maintenance strategies and schedules are put into place; and how the building is managed. If these strategies aren’t implemented. Buildings need to be commis- sioned properly with particular attention paid to control systems and occupant need.
Without this [modelling] the gap in performance can be up to 450 per cent
The power of management
Building management systems and building energy management systems are powerful tools in helping ensure that buildings are run efficiently and that they provide the desired environment for their occupants. As technology becomes cheaper and advances more rapidly, control systems need to be flexible, upgradable and have the facility to easily communicate and integrate with
other systems. However, care needs to be taken in their operation, and staff using these systems need to be fully trained. Ongoing commissioning and preventative maintenance needs to be carried out to ensure the potentially large energy savings are realised, operational costs are controlled and expensive failures do not occur. End-user needs should be taken into
account, while staff training and awareness- raising should be carried out to get the building’s occupants involved. Ongoing commissioning is essentially a higher form of maintenance. Maintenance simply deals with faults. It’s also important to consider management issues. Is the right environment being provided? Is it being provided in the proper place? Are systems being switched off at the right times? If it is not managed properly, the perform- ance gap will only get worse. Modelling doesn’t help with the building in use but ‘baselines’ the building predicted perform- ance. It starts by putting decent controls in place so things are turned off when they are not occupied. Once you have control of the building, you can put the management systems in place so that building is optimised for energy usage.
Focus on people
One of the most important things to remem- ber is that a building is built for its occupants. In terms of costs, staffing is around 95 per cent and workplaces are key to productivity. Any reduction in productiv- ity has a large effect on a business’ bottom line; after all 95 per cent of operational costs are the staff. Buildings need to be efficient, responsive and innovative, which is why it is so important to optimise the environment in first place. It’s imperative that the industry treats the underlying causes and not the symptoms. One of the main problems is that archi- tects are not bringing the design teams early enough in the design process. The later you do this, the more expensive it gets and reduces the benefits in the long term. By engaging with the performance gap, it’s possible to deliver the ‘triple bottom line’ of people, planet and profit.
Dr Andy Lewry is principal technical consultant at BREEAM
ADF OCTOBER 2017
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100