News Is 3G position statement premature?
Four governing bodies, three associations and the Department for Culture Media and Sport state that 3G pitches are safe whilst, in the EU, a total ban is being considered!
In what appears to be a ‘gathering of the clans’, key UK stakeholders have stated that 3G artificial grass pitches with rubber crumb infill are safe.
The governing bodies of four sports, along with SAPCA, the IOG and the Department for Culture Media and Sport cited the European Chemicals Agency’s (ECHA) findings and independent scientific studies in reaching their conclusion. The statement read:
“This position statement is the result of a collaboration between key stakeholders in response to questions and concerns regarding ‘third generation’’ (3G) artificial grass pitches.
Third generation or 3G artificial grass pitches are recognised as durable, safe, year-round playing surfaces, able to withstand intensive use and all kinds of weather. They mean more people can benefit from all the associated social and health benefits of physical activity.
Concerns have, however, been raised about the safety associated with these pitches and their constituent parts, most commonly the presence of rubber crumb. We take these concerns very seriously.
We have monitored numerous independent scientific studies on this issue, which have reported a very low/negligible level of concern for human health as a result of 3G pitches and rubber crumb.
Indeed, the European Chemicals Agency has recently published its own findings, following an extensive EU-wide study, and has found no reason to advise people against playing sport on 3G pitches with rubber crumb.
The Sports and Play Construction Association, the UK trade body for the sports pitch industry, is developing a voluntary industry standard that will provide minimum requirements that go above and beyond what is
4 I PC AUGUST/SEPTEMBER 2017
currently required for rubber crumb under European regulation. Sport England and leading sport governing bodies all support this approach and will continue to work with the industry to provide reassurance that pitches in this country are safe.”
The ECHA’s findings have already been shown to be inconclusive based, as they are, on the same independent studies the position statement alludes to.
Indeed, the ECHA state, quite clearly, that it is uncertain to what extent their findings are representative, that there are knowledge gaps in their report and that the combined effects of all the substances in rubber granules are not known and very difficult to assess! (Search ‘Don’t swallow!’ on the Pitchcare website).
Pitchcare has called for all parties in the UK and the EU to await the findings of the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) in the USA before nailing their colours to the mast. Clearly, the parties involved in this UK position statement do not concur.
Over in the USA, following inconclusive results about the health effects of artificial sports fields, the San Mateo County Civil Grand Jury is urging school district officials to take a closer look at how and when they use artificial turf and engage school communities on the topic.
The Grand Jury is recommending that school districts stop using artificial turf derived of recycled rubber tyres until the ongoing study by the EPA provides further data on the health effects of using tyre-derived products on athletic fields, or until they write decision- making guidelines that take the safety, cost and suitability of materials used to create artificial turf into account.
We believe this is a far more responsible approach than the one currently being adopted in the UK,
and one that we fully support.
Meanwhile, in the EU, the very agency that the UK position statement is based on - the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) - is considering outlawing rubber crumb - which has a high level of carcinogens - from April 2018.
The move has been proposed by Dutch experts after a number of studies questioned the safety of rubber crumb. But this has been opposed by the industry who said it wasn’t needed and would be costly to implement.
Dutch scientists have lodged a proposal with the ECHA which, if accepted, will be rolled out across all of Europe from April 2018.
Former NHS boss Nigel Maguire, believes his teenage son Lewis’s cancer was caused by the rubber crumb he played on as a goalkeeper.
Nigel, a former chief executive of NHS Cumbria, has welcomed the potential ban, but said he is angry it is Dutch scientists proposing the law change and not Brits.
He said: “For the last two years, I have been writing about the potential dangers of rubber crumb. Despite this, I have been ignored by everyone, including the British government.”
“Dutch scientists have the same access to information and scientific databases as British scientists, so why aren’t we drawing the same conclusions?”
Nigel has called for a moratorium on building new 3G pitches and wants rugby and goalkeeping training on them banned until more research is done. “It is obscene so little research has been done. This multibillion-dollar industry is conducting an industrial-scale experiment on our kids - it’s a scandal.”
Professor Andrew Watterson, an environmental health expert from
the University of Stirling, said: “If the proposal is accepted, this will present a test for the crumb rubber industry, which has resisted calls for the lower toy chemical exposures to apply to their products. They view the step as unnecessary.”
“As we learn more about pre-natal and post-natal exposures over decades to many chemicals in many products and try to assess their cumulative health impacts, caution could be a smart move.”
“It would, therefore, seem to make good sense to adopt the precautionary public health policy now being advocated by the Dutch.”
A spokesman for the ECHA said: “The Netherlands has notified its intention to prepare the restriction proposal on PAHs (polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons) in granules used as infill material in synthetic turf. The ECHA will support the Netherlands in its work. Additional information will be collected during the process and actions will be formulated and/or recommended as appropriate.”
A spokesman for SAPCA said: “We have developed a voluntary industry standard that will provide minimum requirements that go above and beyond what is currently required for rubber crumb under European regulation.”
“Sport England and leading sport governing bodies all support this approach and will continue to work with the industry to provide reassurance that pitches in this country are safe.”
As we have said all along, rubber crumb may eventually be deemed to be perfectly safe. It is only at that point that we will stop reporting on the possible health concerns surrounding its use; and the inconsistencies and erratic thinking shown by interested parties in the UK.
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160 |
Page 161 |
Page 162 |
Page 163 |
Page 164
