This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
APRIL 2014 LETTERS C WRITE TO REPLY


Do you have a strong opinion or disagree with somebody else’s views on the industry? If so, we’d love to hear from you – email: healthclub@leisuremedia.com


Innovation vital to closing ‘authenticity gap’


I was interested to read the recent business press coverage (Reuters, CNBC and the New York Times) of the latest Authenticity Gap study from global communications firm FleishmanHillard and its partner Lepere Analytics, as I believe its findings should be a wake-up call for the health and fitness industry. The research identified a


Results of the study didn’t take into account concessions in the public sector


People paying to use facilities don’t represent wider population


It was interesting to read the recent article (HCM March 14, p32) based on my Black and White Retention reports. The reports profiled almost 350,000


members – if published as an academic paper, this would make it one of the largest studies ever – and the operators involved represented the distribution of sectors across the UK, providing like-for-like information about membership retention. The results clearly show that people paying to use facilities don’t represent the full breadth of the population. The results don’t take into account


concessions, which may affect the proportion of public sector users, but these are not the intended participants of the study, which ultimately shows an increasing similarity in the profile of paying members across all sectors. In the MOSAIC breakdown, by far the largest group was Liberal Opinions


6


(100,447); the next largest group was only one-third that size. In addition, while some operators may assume they are opening up new markets, seven out of 10 reported new joiners had previously been members elsewhere. While it may not make us warm and


fuzzy inside, the data is a reflection of the way we design and run our facilities and market and sell memberships. If we want the data to show something else, we must introduce new approaches. Ultimately the public sector will


not survive unless it can become commercially viable as well as community focused, while private sector operators must differentiate themselves from each other in order to carve out their place in the market and demonstrate growth.


Paul Bedford Research director, Retention Guru


Read Health Club Management online at healthclubmanagement.co.uk/digital


Innovation was found to be critical to a company’s reputation


April 2014 © Cybertrek 2014


significant discrepancy between consumers’ expectations of leading brands and their actual experiences. This so-called ‘authenticity gap’, said to undermine customer confidence and business performance, was particularly pronounced in the area of innovation. The research looked at nine drivers of reputation, from ‘doing right’ to ‘customer care’. Of all these drivers, UK respondents cited ‘innovation’ as the most critical for reputation in 75 per cent of the industries analysed – yet in 65 per cent of cases, their experiences did not meet their expectations. Health clubs are not immune.


It’s vital that operators live up to consumers’ expectations, particularly when it comes to technological advancements, in order to close its own ‘authenticity gap’ between consumers’ expectations and experiences.


Leon Houseman Marketing manager, Gladstone MRM


April 2014


August 2013


H


M


E


A


L


U


T


L


H


B


A


N





A


G


E


E


M


E


E


N


T





N


H


E


M


A


L


T


U


H


L


C


B


A


A


G


ALL PHOTOS: WWW.SHUTTERSTOCK.COM


M


N


T


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92