THOUGHT LEADERS INDUSTRY EXPERTS SHARE THEIR VIEWS ON THE CURRENT ISSUES AFFECTING SPORT
Match-fixing is as grave a threat as doping, so why isn’t tackling it given the same priority? TIM LAMB, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF THE SPORT AND RECREATION ALLIANCE @SPORTRECTWEETS
T
he Sport and Recreation Alliance has been making this point for quite some time and in light of a
new flurry of corruption cases in the me- dia, thinks it’s high time we started to step these efforts up a gear. This isn’t to say that work isn’t be-
ing done in this area: at national level, sports governing bodies are working harder than ever to ensure they have robust integrity rules, procedures and whistleblowing mechanisms in place. Also, the Sports Betting Group (SBG) –
led by the Alliance – was set up in 2010 to provide governing bodies with extra support. The group effectively lobbied to secure new legislation which will mean
overseas betting operators will be legally obliged to share all betting intelligence with the Gambling Commission and sports governing bodies, making it easier to investigate suspicious patterns. At a transnational level, the Council
of Europe is drafting an international convention to combat match-fixing, while Interpol and Europol are working closely with international sporting fed- erations like FIFA to educate participants and identify match-fixing networks. But this isn’t enough. It has become a
tiresome truism, but closer collaboration between all agencies is essential if we’re to win the battle against this multi- dimensional problem: sports bodies, law
Tackling corruption in sport comes at a price and many sports bodies are struggling to find the funds needed
enforcement agencies, gambling regula- tors, betting operators and governments all have important roles to play. During the London 2012 Olympics and
Paralympics, a Joint Assessment Unit (JAU) was set up to collect, quickly as- sess and act on information relating to possible corrupt sports betting activ- ity during the Games. The JAU brought together the International Olympic Committee, Gambling Commission and Metropolitan Police and was housed in the offices of UK Anti-Doping in London. The initiative has been widely
regarded as a great success and should be held up as an example of best practice moving forward. We should also look to Australia, which has been ahead of the curve when it comes to bravely and publicly acknowledging and tackling both doping and match fixing. What’s clear is that tackling corruption
in sport comes at a price and many sports bodies are struggling to find the funds needed to invest in integrity measures. So what steps can we take? Firstly,
the government should make a real and public commitment to tackling the match- fixing issue on a collaborative basis. Secondly, funding should be made
available for sports governing bodies to help pay costs associated with player education and additional staffing, as well as intelligence and monitoring. And thirdly, sports should be more
closely consulted when it comes to decid- ing the types of bets that are offered on their sports. With conflicting priorities and levels of resource, the match-fixing issue isn’t always straightforward, but it can be resolved with better collaboration and engagement by all parties involved. One thing is for sure – we can’t move
The integrity of sport is crucial in order for it to inspire future generations to aim for greatness 6 Read Sports Management online
sportsmanagement.co.uk/digital
forward without real commitment from all the stakeholders involved and signifi- cant resources being made available to tackle the issue head on.
Issue 3 2013 © cybertrek 2013
PIC: ©
.SHUTTERSTOCK.COM /PRESSMASTER
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84