WYSIWYG?


In a previous article a couple of years ago I briefly touched on the topic of image and personal impact and the need to consider dressing to a standard that is ‘plus one’ i.e. one higher than that expected by others at work. Others being the boss, the customer and those who will interview us for a new job or a promotion. Many people still think that first impressions count for a lot and, if we want to advance in our career or influence people in a positive way, we should not disappoint them.


All the other candidates would be wearing best jeans and sweaters


One bright morning a few years ago, whilst I was visiting my sister in the USA, my nephew was scheduled to go for a job interview with one of the world's leading imaging companies. If successful, he would be working as a laboratory technician. At breakfast I wished him ‘good luck’ and asked him about his ‘interview suit’. He told me that the job was in the lab and that he was going to the interview in his best jeans and sweater. When I expressed concern he said that it was not an office job and that all the other candidates would also be wearing best jeans and sweaters.


Undaunted, I asked again about his suit. I learned that he did not own a suit. He did not even possess a jacket or even a tie. I myself, on the other hand, had packed a sports jacket, shirt and tie in case formal attire might be needed on my holiday, and I pressed these items onto my nephew. Out of respect for his uncle he agreed to wear them, but expressed the view that he would be self conscious (a downside to this) because he would be the only one wearing formal clothes.


When he returned later in the day I enquired if he indeed was the only person at the interviews wearing a jacket, shirt and tie and he confirmed that he was. I then asked if everyone else wore their best jeans and sweaters to the interview. Again, he confirmed that this


96


was the case. Finally, I asked who got the job and he said “I did Uncle Frank”.


I congratulated him enthusiastically and avoided saying anything about ‘first impressions’ and ‘I told you so’.


Significantly, a year or so later he was the only lab technician not to be put on to short time and, a little while after that, he was the only one in the lab not to be made redundant when his sector hit a downturn (an upside I think).


We can change the negative perceptions that people have of us


Now, with rumours of recession here and in the USA, we cannot go back in time and change a first impression, but we can show the key people in our work lives that we mean business. We can even change the negative perceptions that people may have of us. Perceptions which they may hold, but have never shared with us, and of which we are unaware. This brings me to my next real-life example.


I met Bob after he had attended a number of technical training courses over a short period of time and, as a management consultant, I had been invited in to help him apply all his new learning to real life work problems.


When I explained this to him he seemed unimpressed and indicated that his biggest work problems could not be resolved by any of the training he had undertaken. When I probed for more details he disclosed a number of disappointments and serious concerns that could be summed up as ‘not being taken seriously at work’.


For example, people stole his ideas and presented them at meetings as if they were their own. He attended meetings on behalf of his boss but always at the last minute, and mainly as a message giver and a message taker. He was keen on promotion but was never given opportunities that would give him a chance to show his worth. To compound matters his performance appraisal was due and he had only spent nine minutes


What you see is what you get!


Fresh from his first FEGGA Conference in Brussels and Part 2 of his ‘Pitchcare Essential Management Skills for Groundsmen and Greenkeepers’ workshop at Leicester Tigers - Careers Counsellor and conference speaker FRANK NEWBERRY returns, with some real life examples, to probe the theme of personal image and its impact in the workplace (both positive and negative)


with his boss (his appraiser) in the last twelve months. His appearance suggested a demotivated and depressed individual


Now, I am not the smartest dresser myself but it is worth pointing out Bob’s work attire at this point. On the upside he had a pleasant face and his hair was smartly groomed. He was tall and burly and (on the downside) he had a pot belly accentuated by a droopy worn-out cardigan. He wore moccasins on his feet and his trousers had no crease. He wore an open neck non-descript shirt. Nothing was dirty at all but everything was bordering ‘scruffy’. His appearance, upon reflection, suggested a demotivated and depressed individual.


I asked if he was prepared to participate in an experiment for a month, and he seemed a little apprehensive but, to quote the late Jeremy Beadle, he was ‘game for a laugh’. I reviewed with him the key points of a lecture I had heard on the topic of ‘image’ and I persuaded him to wear his best suit (which happened to be made-to-measure and dark grey), a clean white shirt every day and a dark tie with some red in it. The colour red literally quickens the pulse


The lecture I had heard suggested that black and dark grey are the colours of ‘seriousness’ whereas dark blue and navy are the colours of ‘ambition’. White denotes purity and honesty and the colour red quickens the pulse and suggests the wearer might be an ‘exciting’ individual. To his credit, Bob took all this on board and wore the prescribed clothing to work for a trial period of one month.


I duly returned after a month to discuss with him what had transpired (if anything) during the period in which he had worn the more formal outfit to work.


Bob was wearing the prescribed clothing when we met and he did look smart - in every sense. However, he was in an angry mood and immediately accused me of persuading his colleagues to treat him


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111