Data FEATURE


a position to offer advice on the appropriate structure, storage, and metadata, for research data.


The long-term preservation of data is


likely to have different formatting, storage, and metadata needs to the data during the creation process. Once again, research libraries should be in a position to offer advice. Most importantly, the storage of a research project’s data is likely to extend beyond the scope of an individual project, and needs to be stored in an appropriate repository. Giving access to data is another area in which libraries can be involved. Providing access to the data not only requires that the data is available, but that it can be found and appropriate rights are provided for its reuse. The library community has a long history in the establishment of classification systems, and extensive experience of copyright. At the final stage in the lifecycle, reuse of data requires the finding of data, and ensuring that sufficient information is available for


‘The modern scientific publishing system has become increasingly complicated’


the data to be reused. Of course there is a difference between opportunities being available and opportunities being taken, and for the most part libraries continue to be primarily document-centric.


Although many libraries have established institutional repositories, repositories continue to be focused on documents rather than data. Of the 2,727 repositories listed in OpenDOAR, the Directory of Open Access Repositories, only 131 are currently listed as containing datasets (4.8 per cent). This is not too dissimilar to the results from the same query at the beginning of 2011, which found the proportion to be 4.1 per cent. Distinguishing between institutional repositories and disciplinary datasets draws a bleaker picture for institutional repositories, where only four per cent of institutional repositories are listed as containing datasets in comparison to 11.1 per cent of disciplinary repositories.


Specialised repositories can potentially provide more innovative interactive interfaces for specific types of data than a


www.researchinformation.info @researchinfo


more general institutional repository might hope to achieve, although when data lasts longer than the project, questions remain over who will take responsibility for these orphan works in the long term if a repository closes or data/metadata needs to be updated. Where libraries fail to provide sufficient new and innovative data services, others will. One example of this is the new data journals.


Repackaging data Two new open-access journals that are based on research data rather research findings started publication in 2014: Scientific Data, from the Nature Publishing Group; and Wiley’s Geoscience Data Journal. These publications provide a place for detailed descriptions about how and why a dataset was collected, and are linked to the dataset itself in one of a number of approved repositories. Such products potentially have advantages


for both individual researchers and science as a whole. They provide a greater incentive for the sharing of data by providing a peer- reviewed publication that can be cited and for which a researcher can receive credit, without necessitating new insights or novel findings. They also help with researchers finding and reusing existing datasets. Many of the advantages of these new data journals could have been achieved by the library community without the need for commercial publishers. There are also concerns about publishers expanding their scope when some people perceive them to have abused their market position with high journal price increases. But if libraries are to continue to be relevant, they must be as willing to adapt and learn from publishers’ willingness to innovate with data.


What service will libraries provide? Iain Hrynaszkiewicz, head of data and HSS publishing in open research at Nature Publishing Group/Palgrave Macmillan, sees the role of the librarian as one that will continue to evolve, with greater emphasis on data literacy: ‘Librarians have historically been involved in information literacy training in all its forms, and research data are increasingly equal to other research outputs, such as papers, in research assessment and funding. Providing training on accessing, archiving, publishing and managing data is therefore a natural progression of this role. ‘Data Descriptors, such as those published


by Scientific Data, are important for data discoverability and reusability and meeting funder and institution requirements for data sharing. They could be considered part of best practice for research data management and publication planning for any piece of research. For this reason, we are keen to work together with librarians and information professionals, in


establishing researchers’


skills and understanding of the importance of data management,’ he said.


The need for on-site data management expertise ensures there will be a role for the library and information professional in the future of data management, although the extent to which most libraries and librarians can fulfil these needs is not yet clear. For every example of strong proactive data services, there seem to be many where its data services are limited or non-existent. Technological change requires skill sets that may be limited in the information sector due to the focus of library schools in the past. Information professionals may continue to be part of work, but it is always possible that these workers are distributed on specific projects.


Conclusion


The transformative nature of innovation on library services has been a regular staple of the profession’s literature for many years. Often such works involve predictions that, if not doom-laden, may change the library role beyond all recognition. In comparison, the need for more data-centric services provides great opportunities that clearly fall within a library’s remit, but there are also many potential competitors.


If libraries continue to fulfil their core traditional role, then there needs to be far more innovative approaches to data. Failure to innovate successfully may see the library and librarians with a far more diminished role.


David Stuart is a research fellow at the Centre for e-Research, King’s College, London


FURTHER INFORMATION


OpenDOAR, the Directory of Open Access Repositories www.opendoar.org Scientific Data www.nature.com/sdata Geoscience Data Journal onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ journal/10.1002/(ISSN)2049-6060 EDINA edina.ac.uk DataShare datashare.is.ed.ac.uk


Research Data Oxford policy and training resources researchdata.ox.ac.uk


DECEMBER 2014/JANUARY 2015 Research Information 17


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32