This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Page 46


www.us-tech.com


February, 2012 Production


Drilling Via Holes: Slow and Steady Wins the Race


By Qin Lijie and Wang Dawei, Dalian Pacific Electronics Co., Ltd., Dalian, China


 


    














tiny electronics, and certainly must be light in weight — and all this helps to create difficulties for the PC board fabricator. Conductor line widths and the spacing between them both approach an incredibly tiny 50µm, and the corresponding hole diameters are only 0.10mm. Drilling those holes can become


T


a problem because of a need for low abrasion to the drill bits, keeping down the roughness of the hole walls, all while maintaining a high degree of hole positioning accuracy. The cur- rently and commonly used technolo- gy for this operation has been to use high-speed CNC drills running at 300,000RPM or faster. But the drilling was resulting in rough via hole walls and the drill bits them- selves were getting roughed up — resulting in even rougher holes and short useful life for the drill bits.


Testing Drilling Methods We decided to test various meth-





ods of drilling to see exactly where we could make measurable improve- ments in the resulting vias. We focused our study on three principal elements during the volume drilling production: the abrasion to drill bits, the hole position accuracy, and hole wall roughness. After evaluating the various


factors involved in the drilling process — number of RPM, drilling force, and drill instability, it was decided to use only lower rotational speeds in the 120 to 160kRPM range. In order to reduce abrasion to


drill bits, we found that there were several contributing factors: screw angle, core thickness, core thickness grads and shape.


Hole Positioning Accuracy We found that it was possible to


increase hole positioning accuracy by changing the cover board texture, and adjusting the rotating speed and feed-in speed, we are able to control the hole position tolerance within ±30µm. To reducing roughness of the


High Performance Cleaners for Electronic Applications


Impressive Value with the End User Completely in Mind


Save on quality high-performance cleaners and maintenance products for electronics. Contact your electronic distributor or visit us on the web at www.puretronics.com


T.A. EMERALD INDUSTRIES 1580 East Edinger Ave. • Suite K • Santa Ana, CA 92705 • (800) 280-0020


hole wall, we evaluated the cutting ability under different conditions, such as drill bit diameter, board thick- ness, and stacking layers, and were able to control the hole wall roughness less than 20µm. We then implemented test by using two different kinds of PC board materials — ordinary FR-4 and High Tg laminates. Via hole drilling today is mainly


performed with high speed CNC drilling machines, typically at 250kRPM and more. But, in the high speed CNC drilling, when the drill diameter is 0.20mm or more, the best feed-in speed of 3500mm/min and higher, the hole precision will suffer and there be other effects from mechanical vibration. The result is that some holes will not meet the qual- ity requirements for printed substrate. To correct this problem, our


oday’s electronics carry every- thing to extremes — everything must be faster, use incredibly


company has instituted special micro via drilling technology in the difficult processing areas. When drilling 0.10mm via holes, we do not use high speed drilling machines, but a slower rotational speed of 160kRPM.


Experimental Verification Because of the geometry of the


drill bit itself affects the quality of the hole (the hole position accuracy, hole wall roughness), we needed to verify two variables: the shape of the drill bit front, and the tip angle of the drill. The tests varied the drill bit


shapes, the rotational speed, feed-in speed and the number of holes drilled, from 2,000 to 6,000. The results showed clearly that using Type C and Type D cutting tools, when cutting at a drill speed of 150kRPM and a feed- in speed of 900mm/min, the cutting conditions were relatively better, and the hole precision averaged stabilized within 20µm.


Via hole drilling today is mainly performed with high


speed CNC drilling machines, typically at 250kRPM and


more. But, in the high speed CNC drilling, when the drill diameter is 0.20mm or more, the hole precision will suffer and there be other effects from mechanical vibration.


In another experiment, when


evaluating the hole position accuracy and bit consumption with the different types of drill (Type C, Type D), drilling 6000 holes, for testing the bit life speed of rotation was 150 kprm, with feed-in speed of 900mm/min. The results showed that the best drilling condition is Type D, bit cutting condition: drill speed of 150kRPM and feed-in speed 900mm/min, bit life 2000 Hits. Evaluating the hole wall rough-


ness of different materials, we used processing conditions that involved drilling material stack 0.1mm holes x 4 pieces, 0.2mm x 3 pieces, 0.3mm x 3 pieces, 0.4mm x 2 pieces, 0.5mm x 2 pieces, using normal FR-4 and high Tg material. The hole wall roughness (the micro-section after copper plat- ing) was inspected, and there was a definite correlation with the material being drilled and its thickness. The best results were obtained with the thinnest section of High Tg material, followed closely by FR-4. Analyzing the outcomes of these experiments, it can be concluded that the 0.10mm via can be processed by the common drilling machine running at 160 - kRPM, with good results for both


normal FR-4 and high Tg materials. Contact: Dalian Pacific


Electronics Co., Ltd., 127 Liao-he-xi Road, Jinzhou New District, Dalian, China 116600 % (86-411) 8718 9366 fax: (86-411) 8792 1512 E-mail: victor.gao@dpmc.com.cn or marketing@dpec.cn Web: www.dpec.cn

Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100