Metalcasting Industry Roadmap Program Milestones
Task 1: Defining the Landscape The AMC RTAC reviewed past metalcasting and related roadmaps and conducted surveys to determine baseline metalcasting industry needs. $ GHVLJQDWHG ³VHOHFW´ team of experts was developed to review the surveys, determine areas of metalcasting technology gaps, and outline general areas of R&D needs. The efforts were coordinated by the AMC RTAC and reviewed by the AMC REC.
Task 2: Preparing the Surface for the Road
The AMC REC helped set the topics, agenda, discussion leaders, and framework for the Roadmapping Development Workshop. A list of invitees was established, a date and location was set, and invitations were sent out. Prior to the meeting, results of Task 1 activities, including interviews, were compiled into workshop background materials and sent to the invitees, who were asked to identify focus areas such as advanced technology, new processes, education and training, industry
needs, consortium and collaboration, transformative Task 3: Roadmapping Development Workshop
The AMC Roadmapping Development Workshop was conducted May 12-13, 2015 at the Hyatt 5HJHQF\ 2¶+DUH 5RVHPRQW ,/ 7KLUW\-six experts were specially selected from industry, academia, and government to attend the workshop. The goal of the workshop was to identify future metalcasting research / technology / workforce needs. Participants presented and discussed the important metalcasting issues and the required R&D / technologies / resources needed in small breakout groups consisting of six to eight people per group. Each breakout group session lasted 45 minutes and had a facilitator and a record keeper. The four breakout group areas were: process, materials, design, and workforce. Participants are listed in Table 3 and their biographies, key issues, and results from this workshop are contained in the Appendix.
Task 4: Finishing the Road and Creating a Vision for the Future
The AMC REC reviewed, revised, and finalized the roadmap document. Before the final roadmap was issued, a draft document was sent out to those that participated in the roadmapping workshop for their suggestions and feedback.
and disruptive
technologies, etc. for participation in breakout sessions. The breakout sessions were facilitated by the selected members of the REC.
20
Overview
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96