search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
@fibresystemsmag | www.fibre-systems.com


CONTENTS FOREWORD


F BRESYSTEMS Contents


Issue 15 • Spring 2017 5


11 14


16 20 25


29 33


News


Keysight Technologies to acquire Ixia l Colt plans European bandwidth assault l Source Photonics invests in next- generation FTTx products l Full speed ahead for FTTH as subscribers pass 44 million


Technology Focus


‘BICSEL’ holds promise for faster computing and telecom links l Transceiver noise limits optical system capacity l Fine-tuning network design can save wavelength resources


Opinion: Fibre versus wireless


‘Fibre versus wireless’ is an increasingly ridiculous stance to take, argues Pauline Rigby


Feature: Battle of the modulation schemes


Adam Carter and Dan Tauber examine which modulation schemes – DMT, PAM4 or coherent – are likely to prevail in higher speed but for more cost-sensitive optical links


Feature: How telecom can combat climate change


BT, Telefonica, and Telia Carrier describe how the communications industry is reducing carbon emissions, even as data consumption escalates


Feature: Software-defined networking


Jonathan Homa examines the benefits of taking a more holistic view of network optimisation


Show Preview: OFC 2017


A look ahead to what’s on show at the Optical Fiber Communications conference and exhibition in Los Angeles on 19 – 23 March


Product Update A round-up of recent new product announcements


25 20 11


Foreword Cost-per-bit crunch


showing revenue per bit collapsing under the internet pricing model essentially providing unlimited data, while the cost per bit declines in a more leisurely fashion. I’ve seen a selection of such charts before, but 2017 will be the year the crossover occurs, according to veteran industry analyst and president of CIMI Corp Tom Nolle. Te crossover point can’t be the whole story; if


T


it was then nobody in the communication industry would be making any money, and that’s clearly not the case. Nevertheless, Nolle believes cost pressures will trigger spending cuts that will be passed on through the supply chain. ‘With operators facing this kind of cost-revenue convergence, the first and easiest answer is to spend less on infrastructure,’ he wrote on his blog. Declining revenues per bit explains why


operators are keen on network transformation initiatives, and soſtware-defined networking (SDN) in particular. SDN and the related concept of network functions virtualisation (NFV) promise to help operators optimise networks, by making more efficient use of resources, reducing network downtime and enabling service agility. On page 25 Jonathan Homa examines the benefits that can be realised when SDN is used to integrate the worlds of IP and optical. As traffic carried on data centre interconnect


Cover: Bukhavets Mikhail/Shutterstock.com


Editorial and administrative team Editor: Dr Pauline Rigby • pauline.rigby@europascience.com • Tel: +44 (0)1223 221030 Subscription marketing manager: Sarah Sharpe • sarah.sharpe@europascience.com • Tel: +44 (0)1223 221036


Advertising and production team Advertising manager: Sarah Ellis-Miller • sarah.ellis.miller@europascience.com • Tel: +44 (0)1223 221037 Production manager: Pete Vine • pete.vine@europascience.com • Tel: +44 (0)1223 221033 Design: David Houghton • david.houghton@europascience.com • Tel: +44 (0)1223 221034


Corporate team Managing director: Warren Clark • warren.clark@europascience.com


Fibre Systems is published by Europa Science Ltd, 4 Signet Court, Cambridge CB5 8LA, UK. Tel: +44 (0)1223 221030 Fax: +44 (0)1223 213385 Web: www.europascience.com ISSN: 2053-5147


All editorial information should be sent to editor.fibresystems@europascience.com


Subscribe for FREE online at www.fibre-systems.com/subscribe


and other regional networks multiplies, enterprise and cloud service providers are looking for more cost-effective transmission technologies, measured by cost per bit-kilometre. Coherent transceivers aren’t a perfect match for these more cost-sensitive links. On page 16, Oclaro’s Adam Carter and Dan Tauber weigh the options for lower-cost alternatives. On page 20 Andy Extance considers another


SUBSCRIPTIONS: Free registrations available to qualifying individuals. Subscriptions £120 per year for 4 issues to readers outside registration requirements. Enquiries to Europa Science, 4 Signet Court, Cambridge CB5 8LA, UK. Tel: +44 (0)1223 221030. Fax: +44 (0)1223 213385. ©2017 Europa Science Ltd. While every care has been taken in the compilation of this magazine, errors or omissions are not the responsibility of the publishers or of the editorial staff. Opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the publishers or editorial staff. All rights reserved. Unless specifically stated, goods or services mentioned are not formally endorsed by Europa Science Ltd, which does not guarantee or endorse or accept any liability for any goods and/or services featured in this publication. US COPIES: Fibre Systems is published by Europa Science Ltd and distributed in the US by DSW, 75 Aberdeen Road, Emigsville PA 17318-0437. Periodicals postage paid at Emigsville PA. Postmaster: Send address changes to Fibre Systems, PO Box 437, Emigsville PA 17318-0437.


aspect of business that affects cost per bit – the cost of energy used to transport those bits. In recent years, operators like BT, Telefonica and Telia Carrier have kept energy consumption stable in spite of rising data traffic. It’s imperative they do, or energy and environmental costs could spiral out of control. As ever, enjoy the magazine. To make sure you never miss an issue, subscribe via our website.


Pauline Rigby Editor, Fibre Systems pauline.rigby@europascience.com


Issue 15 • Spring 2017 FIBRE SYSTEMS 3


he cost per bit is a well-known metric in the optical industry; revenue per bit is another. Most carriers have drawn charts


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40