search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Getting the right start


All babies should be born with an equal opportunity to achieve their full potential By Sir Harry Burns


▏ ALL BABIES BORN IN SCOTLAND should have an equal opportunity to achieve their full potential in life. Tat concept seems to me to be a matter of justice. It’s also a matter of common sense. As our population ages we will need the intellect, commitment and contribution of every young person in our society if we are to survive the stresses and strains already apparent across the world in the 21st century. Yet, despite decades of research and debate, the chances that a young girl born in the most eco- nomically deprived parts of Scotland – and most of these are in the West of Scotland – will achieve a happy, fulfilled adulthood are less than if she were to be born in one of the more affluent areas. However, it is important to empha- sise that her chances of success in life are nowhere near zero. Despite hardship and difficulty, a great many families are doing their best for their chil- dren and those efforts need to be acknowledged. But while life expec- tancy in the poorest parts of Scotland has risen in recent decades, it has risen more amongst the affluent and, as a result, the gap in life expectancy has widened. So, it looks as if our Holyrood baby might experience a shorter life than she might if she were born to parents in Bearsden or Barnton. In fact, our baby is likely to live about a decade less than her more affluent neighbours. Not only will it be shorter but more of it is likely to be lived while suffering from a chronic illness. Te gap in healthy life expectancy between rich


and poor is even wider than the gap in actual life expectancy. Many will assume that the root causes of this shortened life expectancy are due to the choices that our baby makes as she grows up. She is likely to smoke more and drink more alcohol. She is more likely to take drugs and become pregnant as a teenager. So, it’s all her fault, then? For decades, this was the conventional wisdom. People who made bad choices in life were simply short of information. After all, we humans are rational and if we get the correct information in a form we understand, we will make the sensible choices, won’t we? Well, not really. Tere are many reasons why we differ in the choices we make. Suggesting that better understanding of what causes illness will mean that everyone avoids illness misses the fact that we differ in the value we place on our health. When I was a consultant at Glasgow Royal


Infirmary, I lost count as to how often I would tell a patient that his drinking would probably kill him. “Ach, why should I bother?” would come the reply. “What have I got to live for? Drink’s the only pleasure I get in life.” Numerous studies tell us that the choices we make in life, the way we interact with each other are determined to a large part by the experiences we have in early life. Children who experience chaotic, affectionless childhoods are more likely to experience mental health problems and do badly at school. Tey are more likely to become alcoholics, misuse drugs, experience teenage pregnancy and end up in jail. Tey are also more likely to have earlier onset of chronic disease such as diabetes and heart disease. If our Holyrood baby falls into that group of chil- dren who experience neglect and abuse, then her outlook is poor. But, it is not just the poorest 10 per cent of families whose outcomes are worse than the rest. Across society, there is a step- wise gradient in risk. Tose who are just a little worse off than the wealthiest have outcomes which are a little bit poorer than the best and so on, all the way down the soci- oeconomic scale. Te harder a family has to struggle, the more likely the babies are to have a poorer outcome. I believe that the purpose of the public sector should be to ensure that all citizens in a coun-


try should have equal opportunity to achieve their full potential. Tis chimes closely with the Scottish Gov- ernment’s stated aim of creating a more successful country with opportunities for all to flourish through increasing sustain- able economic grow. Achieving that aim is entirely possible. In recent years, Scot- land has used innovative approaches to transform safety in hospitals and improve


important markers of child wellbeing by reducing stillbirth rates and infant mortality. Support for families in difficulty, the mentoring of young people at school, help for looked-after children are all areas where we can transform the lives of those most in need. Te neces- sary methods are already in use in Scotland. We know how to do it. If our Holyrood baby is to become the superstar she might have the capacity to be, we need to scale up our efforts soon. Te clock is ticking for her. ⌜


23 May 2016 www.holyrood.com 31


AT BIRTH


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48