This book includes a plain text version that is designed for high accessibility. To use this version please follow this link.
Indeed one Scotish judge, Lord McEwan, remarked in 2008: “I have an uneasy feeling that the legislation and the strict way the courts have interpreted it has failed a generation of children who have been abused and whose atempts to seek a fair remedy have become mired in the legal system.”


That is a damning indictment. Another Scotish judge, Lord Clarke, observed in McE v de La Salle Brothers (2007) - a case involving alleged abuse at St Ninian’s Residential School in Stirling - that Parliament did not have in mind issues such as repressed memory when it passed the 1973 Scotish Act. He argued it was therefore not appropriate to stretch the statutory language, making clear that if a problem existed, it was for Parliament to solve it.


This helps to explain why abuse survivors have been agitating for the removal of the time-bar in relation to their claims for a number of years (see chapter six of the Shaw Report). It is impossible to avoid the conclusion that in Scotland, as well as England and Wales, the current legislation as framed and interpreted does not adequately provide for them. Both the Scotish and UK Parliaments therefore need to address this problem as a mater of urgency.


The Scotish Government has taken the first step with its consultation. The debate will hopefully also extend south of the border and culminate in legislation in both jurisdictions. While we wait for that to happen, those who have been so grievously wronged in childhood can at least hope that some positive change may finally be in sight.


Photos posed by models August 2015 17


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100