APOCALYPSE


A


BITTER BATTLE between environmental experts and the rich


and powerful agri-chemical giants is brewing once more over the fate of our bees.


It is a David and Goliath encounter which will become even fiercer the closer we move towards the end of a ban on nerve agent-style pesticides known as Neonicotinoids, (neonics).


And Scotland is right at the heart of it.


Having lost an estimated third of its bee population within the last few years, according to beekeepers, Scotland now faces a concerted campaign by many farmers and agri- businesses to re-introduce the banned pesticides in at least a limited form.


Following a number of incidents of mass poisonings of bees, the European Food Safety Authority in 2013 banned


10 August 2015


It is a David and Goliath encounter which will become even fiercer the closer we move towards the end of a complete ban on nerve agent-style pesticides known as Neonicotinoids, (neonics).


Special Report


the use of three neonics - imidaclorid, clothianidin, and thiamethoxam - for use on flowering crops. The ban is up for review in December even though their use has been blamed for the decimation of bees and other pollinating insects throughout the world in recent decades.


Despite this, the National Farmers Union is encouraging farmers to apply to DEFRA for a partial reintroduction of the deadly pesticides. The NFU want to use neonics as seed treatments prior to sowing. It follows widespread complaints from farmers who say they are experiencing heavy crop losses (around 5 per cent), particularly in oilseed rape, since the ban. Since the moratorium farms have had to return to using older types of pesticides to which many insects have developed a natural resistance.


Agri-giant Syngenta, which produces thiamethoxam, has opposed the ban, claiming it is “based on poor science and ignores a wealth of evidence from the field.”


It says much of the research into the effects of neonics on bees has been laboratory-based, using dosages far in excess of those to which bees are exposed in the field. It also claims field trials - which are difficult to implement and control - have been inconclusive. A lawsuit raised by Syngenta against the


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100