This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
has been another area that crews have been working hard on (and is also the subject of much scrutiny from rivals). This division of uses in turn determines


the positioning of the switches that control the multitude of hydraulic functions, be it buttons on the cockpit sole for the grinders to operate with their feet or the complex array located on and around the wheel for the helmsman to punch. These latter controls usually include ride


height and fore and aft trim, which on the AC50s are much improved compared to the AC72s, now that rudder rake can be adjusted to play a part. This welcome addi- tion should not only improve the stability with which the AC50 foils both upwind and downwind but should also prove valu- able for safety, through reduced likelihood of a pitchpole or capsize. Unlike the more familiar cockpit sole- mounted buttons that control winch speed, the switches for the hydraulic func- tions are electrical rather than mechanical, operating electric hydraulic valves as well as the winch disconnect (in other words, when the pedestals are only powering the hydraulics). Of course the controls for the hydraulic functions are not merely in/out or up/down, but some such as the rake and cant of the boards require different switches that permit continuous trimming. Aside from ye olde rope wing sheet, the


other controls in the wing are also all operated by hydraulics. According to Wiss, these typically comprise at least two rams controlling the camber of the wing (ie


Harken’s latest Air Winch, like the original Polo Mint… makes perfect sense when you think about the engineering. Larger bearing surfaces are usually preferable so replacing a heavy-centre spindle by light ‘outer’ bearings delivers a double benefit


the relative angle between the front and rear elements) and the twist (the relative angle of the flaps up the height of the wing’s trailing edge). All these rams are housed within the


bottom of the wing to keep weight low. Of course, while just one cable ultimately attaches to each of these rams, further up the wing they divide and sub-divide, fanning out to control different parts of the wing. This, combined with the necessity of the wing to be able to flop on to the exact same settings between tacks, means the complexity of the wing’s innards makes it end up resembling the insides of a piano. Again exactly how these cables control


the wing is a closely guarded secret between teams and hidden from prying eyes by the Clysar membrane that covers the wing’s inner skeleton along with its workings. While hydraulic operation may be necessary due to the small crew, the speed of the AC50 and the pace at which manoeuvres occur, a downside is that crew must now rely almost entirely on displays, rather than feel, to determine the loads for many key components; although funda- mental aspects such as the fore and aft trim and ride height can still be determined by the helmsman based on feel or observation. There is of course the continued drive


to maintain an athletic aspect to racing AC50s through the grinding team. How- ever, it doesn’t take a massive leap of imagination to see a future iteration of the boat becoming rope free, entirely operated by hydraulics, and for the human engine to be replaced by a mechanical one – as was the case with the giant multihulls in the Deed of Gift match of 2010. It would easily be possible to log settings for all the hydraulics for different wind strengths, points of sail and so on, and from there to be able to ‘auto-tack’ or for fore and aft trim to be auto-levelling through the use of high-speed gyroscopic sensors. As an academic exercise, the prospect of


a boat like this being fitted with the ultimate fly-by-wire system, turning it into a doublehander, is technically fascinating, but apparently not a development for which the sport is ready…





WWW.MAR L OWRO P ES . C OM


CONTROL QUANTUM R ACING MARLOW,


Photo credit: Photo by Keith Brash © Quantum Racing


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88