Showcase – Olympic Offshore Sailing
One century ago the International Twelve Metre Class was raced in the Olympic Games (1908, 1912 and 1920). Olympic keelboats got smaller over the years and eventually were phased out altogether for the 2012 and 2016 Games. Last year the International Olympic Committee invited World Sailing to propose a new Showcase Event to be held alongside the Olympics for Tokyo 2020. After a vote by the 41 members of the World Sailing Council it was decided to present submissions to the IOC for two events – one kiteboarding and one offshore. Either, or both, of these proposals could be approved. World Sailing will send in its formal decision after a Council meeting scheduled for May 2017. For offshore sailors this provides a unique and exciting oppor- tunity. The Offshore and Oceanic Committee spent several months working on its proposal. The proposed number of boats entered would be 18-20. There would be two crew on each boat, one man and one woman. The mixed-crew format proved very successful in Rio in the Nacra 17 class.
Part of the vision of the Offshore Showcase Event is to attract well-known offshore sailors from round-the-world races and other major events. This would add to the excitement at the Olympics. The Offshore Committee also debated whether the athletes should be from the pool of qualifiers from other classes or different sailors? This will be discussed over the next few months. Every sport works hard to attract their top athletes. Sailing currently awards medals for 10 Olympic classes; it is important to note that a ‘Showcase Event’ is not an official Olympic event, but a development concept for the future.
One of the factors that worked against keeping keelboats in the recent Olympics Games was the perceived high cost of purchasing and campaigning these boats. The offshore proposal calls for using
manufacturer-provided boats. This will keep the cost low. At this early stage the choice of boat is not as important as the format of the event. The vision is to use a boat that is 9-12m in overall length.
The event would have a marathon feel to it with continuous racing for three to four days. Each boat would carry a tracker and video to feed position and images 24 hours per day. The onboard robotic cameras would be mounted in strategic spots on deck, and include microphones. The conversation when both crew are on deck would be fascinating. Viewers might just keep watching, especially when the raceboats are close. Specific images of each boat would be available on the internet so you could follow your favourite team. The course would feature beautiful backdrops against the moun- tainous Japanese coast. The race committee would have the option of changing the length of the course, depending on the wind strength, so that the fleet would finish in the daylight. The finish line could be set right in the Olympic harbour. Considering how close the finishes are on the long legs of the Volvo Ocean Race, the final result could come right down to the wire.
Sailing fans would be able to tune in to the race at all times.
There would never be any time zone issues. Using the example of other major offshore races like the Volvo Ocean Race, Vendée Globe, or races to Bermuda, around Fastnet Rock or to Hobart, there is a large following on all social media platforms who now watch these races.
In a nod to the future, electronic umpires could be introduced, so protests and penalties would be decided during the race, prior to the finish. The first boat across the line would be the winner. Stan Honey – Chairman, Offshore and Oceanic Committee Gary Jobson – Vice-President, World Sailing
q
Pump that puppy… This is not Quiberon Bay, this is Thierry Chabagny and Corentin Douguet racing their Figaro across the Atlantic double-handed in the 2008 Transat AG2R when they finished 8th. In 2016 Chabagny would win the AG2R sailing with Erwan Tabarly. Scenes like this with onboard sound are surely a chance to engage the wider public with Olympic sailing on an unprecedented scale
SEAHORSE 29
BENOIT STICHELBAUT
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88
