A dose of common sense
On 1 January 2017 the new edition of the World Sailing Racing Rules of Sailing will come into effect. Over the past four years World Sailing has received and considered proposals from all over the world on how the rulebook should evolve. The final result was published in July and is available as a free download on the World Sailing website, with the rule changes coming into force at the start of 2017. Not all changes are mentioned here but this is a summary of those that are probably the most significant. The biggest change to the rules affecting when boats meet on the water is to rule 18.3 (tacking in the zone). The rewritten rule will only make a difference in the case of a starboard-hand mark rounding or when both boats tack inside the zone (port-hand round- ings are unaffected). A boat that tacked in the zone must also be fetching the mark after the tack if the amended rule is to apply. Under the revised rule, at a starboard-rounding mark a boat tacking in the zone from starboard to port must complete her tack while keeping clear of boats approaching on port tack (as normal) and must keep clear of these boats if they become overlapped to leeward during the rounding. However, the boat that tacked will no longer break rule 18 if she causes the other (port tack) boats to sail above close-hauled to avoid her after she completes her tack (which was the case previously).
Another change to the right of way rules concerns the backing of a sail. This is a result of the increasing practice at startlines of dinghies crabbing to windward by backing a sail, with the effect that a windward boat finds it almost impossible to keep clear. New rule 22.3 provides that a boat crabbing must keep clear of one that is not (similar to the existing rule that places the onus of keeping clear on a boat that may be backing down at a startline). Lastly, in the right of way rules the power to disqualify a boat from a race because of an incident that occurs outside racing (eg before the preparatory signal or after the finish) has been extended
to include incidents where injury or serious damage are caused. Looking to other aspects of the new rules, the U Flag starting penalty is now a standard option for race officers to use following positive feedback during trials. The rule operates in much the same way as the Black Flag rule: if a boat is over the line in the final minute of the start sequence she is disqualified. However, disqual- ification is avoided if the race is restarted or resailed (which is not always the case when starting under a Black Flag). There have also been large-scale changes to rules 3 and 69 concerning acceptance of the rules and misconduct. The require- ment for misconduct to be ‘gross’ has been removed and protest committees can impose a wider range of penalties at the event before a report is required to be submitted to the national authority. Entering a race now includes agreement by a competitor and by the boat owner to ensure that all support personnel (including coaches and parents) are aware of the rules, and that support persons can now be directly penalised for their conduct. The competing boat can also now be penalised for breaches of the rules by their support persons (see new rule 64.4).
Other changes to the rules include: l Disqualifications under rule 2 (Fair Sailing) can be excludable or non-excludable, at the discretion of the protest committee. l Event measurers and equipment inspectors now constitute part of a ‘technical committee’, which has the power to protest instead of merely reporting breaches to the race committee. l The Offshore Special Regulations can specify additional requirements for lifelines. l As now, protests must state details of the relevant incident; however, the precise information of where and when an incident occurred can be provided before or during the hearing. Jon Napier, director of legal affairs and governance
q
The pressure on a jury is never greater than when large sums of money and insurance companies become involved – underwriters often now stipulate that a full hearing will be necessary even if an agreement has been reached through arbitration. This expensive day’s yachting was at Les Voiles de St Tropez when Wally Tilakkhana speared Wally Ryokan 2. There’s a joke in there somewhere…
24 SEAHORSE
INGRID ABERY
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92