058 BRIEF ENCOUNTERS
‘As an academic and now as a potential social entrepreneur, it becomes very important to me to clearly define the remits and the ambition of... biodesign’
Right Malik found her niche between science and architecture
Far right Her bio tiles are meant to be easily replicable for local artisans, but also bespoke for each region’s climate and pollution variance
preserving the carbon-guzzling, consumerist status quo. While the field of speculative art and design has blossomed, with several recent exhibitions dedicated to this burgeoning arena – including 2019–20’s Eco-Visionaries exhibition at the Royal Academy in London – most of the work they show is either nostalgic and utopian, downright fantastical or strictly dystopian, as if planetary annihilation was a done deal (and even Bill Gates thinks we have a fighting chance of preventing that, judging by his new book How To Avoid A Climate Disaster). But then I heard about architect and biodesigner Shneel Malik, whose new invention, Indus, could represent a genuine breakthrough for small-scale manufacturers in developing countries. It was recently selected for an Arts Foundation Futures Award (£10,000 for each of the five recipients). As the judges saw, Indus is biodesign at its best: the patterns in Malik’s elegantly crenellated ceramic tiles are inspired by the veins of a leaf – nature’s super-efficient design to speed water to where it’s needed most – and are both attractive and easily made by local artisans using local materials (although kiln firing is not the most planet-friendly technology, alternatives are being explored). Produced using a mould devised by the Indus team’s algorithms so that it is tailored to suit the scale and type of pollution for each site, the tiles are then affixed to a simple frame that is mounted on one exterior wall. Te grooves in the tiles are injected with a seaweed-based hydrogel containing microalgae that can remove pollutants – even heavy metal ones
such as cadmium – from waste water as it pours down the frame from outlets placed along the top of the wall. Te water can then be recirculated within the factory. Although the tiles will need cleaning and refilling with algae every few months, there is nothing too expensive or technically challenging about any of it, judging by trials Malik has conducted on test sites in India – all of them textile processing factories. Malik says the tailored, small-scale approach is perfectly suited to this sector, and responds to emerging pressure from its big brand customers (like H&M), who want their suppliers to be more sustainable, coupled with local authorities’ tendency to fine factories for polluting their water sources – while offering no alternative solutions.
I chatted with Malik on Zoom in February to find out how she made this switch from architecture to biodesign. Having attained a BA in Architecture at Amity University, India, her desire to explore more sustainable practices inspired her to head to London in 2013 to join a new master’s programme at Te Bartlett, investigating potential alliances between architecture, chemical engineering and biology. Called BiotA, it was founded by Professor Marcos Cruz, and now runs as the Bio- Integrated Design Lab in conjunction with Dr Brenda Parker, professor of biochemical engineering. Te inspiration for Indus came about directly from Malik’s PhD research, with support from her course leaders. Although interested in science, she says ‘I never knew how to bridge it with architecture. When I saw that little door slip open, I jammed
my foot in it and thought: this is my spot. Terms such as bio-integrated design or bio- compatible are not used within architecture. Tey are used within science way more. When we are talking about sustainability or green building design, these terms have been abused and haven’t been defined well enough. Tat’s why, as an academic and now as a potential social entrepreneur, it becomes very important to me to clearly define the remits and the ambition, plus the limitations, of what we are trying to do when it comes to biodesign.’ Tat social entrepreneur label is the next step. ‘UCL Innovation and Enterprise and Bio- Integrated Design Lab and Te Bartlett are helping me do this,’ she says. ‘It’s a creative design-model challenge. It lets me do the design and research and development, but also lets me make it happen. For someone who comes with the vision and belief, it’s important for me to demonstrate how circular economy models and bioeconomic models can be executed.’ But there is still one problem that needs resolving: getting clients and users to understand that the material that is benefitting their water supply is a living entity and needs caring for. ‘Anything that’s living as a prototype needs to be maintained,’ Malik continues. ‘Tese cells need to be hydrated; they need to be gardened; they need their nutrients every now and then.’ Te solution is something very analogue: that old fashioned skill of storytelling. ‘It’s important for us to tell them a story of how they really can use design in setting new standards not just for themselves but for future generations.’
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160 |
Page 161
