| 73
In most places, to restore the world’s forests we need to do just two things: to ensure that ownership of the world’s forests is vested in the people who live in them, and to give nature room
or urban expansion. The remaining three quarters divide equally between forests consumed by wildfires, cleared temporarily for shifting cultivation and logged but with clear evidence of regrowth”. Pearce suggests these naturally regenerating areas face new threats because they are below the radar, often classified by governments as “degraded”, so not qualifying for protection and more likely to be cleared for plantations of oil palm or acacia. Much of the area is also outside forest reserves and on farms. He argues that these areas which may look like degraded or abandoned land, are “actually the cutting edge of a global reforestation” and that the “trick for policymakers is to find ways of protecting and making good use of those new forests”. For Pearce, a large part of this “trick” lies in giving local people control over these forests. He provides numerous real world examples to show the inherent advantages of vesting ownership rights with local people and communities. He references a review of 130 local studies in 14 countries, conducted by the World Resources Institute (WRI), a Washington think tank, and the Rights and Resources Initiative (RRI), which found that community-owned forests suffer less deforestation and fewer fires, while storing more carbon than other forests. He notes in the closing chapter that “we used to be told that forests have to be saved from the people who live in them, but the opposite is usually the case”. Pearce stops short of exploring the implications of this new frontier of natural reafforestation for the forest products sector, understandably as that is not his focus. But for an insight into those implications, it is worth returning to the eastern US as the one area of the world where a vast naturally regenerated hardwood forest, in the hands of millions of small family owners, is just reaching maturity. The American hardwood sector demonstrates very clearly how sustainable use of this type of forest helps to conserve biodiversity, forest carbon stocks and other environmental values, while also providing a reliable supplementary source of income for non-industrial forest owners. The US hardwood sector also shows that this form of sustainable use is not inevitable. Indeed there are persistent threats to the resource from outside the sector, not least
the pressure to convert for housing and other urban development, and mounting threats from pests and wildfires. Ensuring landowners have secure property rights goes some distance to ensuring forest remain standing, but these owners also need to be nudged in the direction of forest conservation through sensitive application of property taxes, provision of forest extension services for smallholders, and work to build markets for sustainable wood products and other ecosystem services from standing forests. Also essential is good quality data on forest condition, extent, and species composition, combining data from satellite imagery and regular assessment of on-ground sample plots, together with regular owner surveys. To ensure sustainable wood production and use, these naturally regenerating forests distributed across numerous landholdings require processing facilities, supply chains and markets able to handle a wide range of log sizes and grades, and a high diversity of species with varying technical qualities, colours, and grains. This is a very different proposition from plantations where large vertically integrated, often capitally intensive, industries can be built drawing on large volumes of largely undifferentiated wood fibre. The US hardwood sector, which has evolved over generations to handle this more complex and fragmented resource, comprises a distributed network of several thousand sawmills, mainly small and often family owned, each typically sourcing from a wood basket of thousands of forest owners within a 25 to 100 mile radius.
Alongside this network of small sawmills, a free and large internal market for wood products in the US plays an important role to facilitate the aggregation, sorting, and filtering of raw materials from a large number of smallholders and small companies, allowing efficient delivery of large commercial volumes of precisely graded materials into a wide range of end use sectors and for export.
The structure of the resource and industry is strongly reflected in the marketing activities of AHEC which celebrate the diversity of US hardwoods and focus heavily on encouraging use of those species and grades that are still underutilised and underappreciated. This is well illustrated by AHEC’s “Guide to Sustainable American Hardwoods” which
covers 18 commercial hardwoods providing comprehensive data on their technical properties, forest distribution and availability, alongside case studies of their use in a wide range of applications.
Making good use of these new forests also requires new thinking around certification. Experience in the US hardwood sector has shown that there can be insurmountable technical barriers to FSC and PEFC certification systems – that impose a long list of technical requirements on individual “forest management units” – when forest ownership is highly fragmented. Less than 2% of private non-industrial forest area and much less than 1% of ownerships are certified in the US. To overcome these challenges, new forms of risk-based certification at jurisdictional level are required that impose no additional costs on individual smallholders, and no unnecessary constraints or excessive transaction costs on trade in wood from low risk regions. This year, AHEC has initiated an ambitious programme of work on this issue, building on an accumulating wealth of experience of jurisdictional risk assessment and operator due diligence in the US and elsewhere. The intent is to develop an innovative certification framework for hardwood from low intensity non- industrial forest operations based on high quality forest inventory data, independent expert analysis of forest condition, carbon content and governance, and that leverages new technologies such as Stable Isotope Ratio Analysis (SIRA) to guarantee wood provenance.
The hardwood industry is too often dismissed as rather quaint and outmoded. The future, we are led to believe, lies in large “modern” industries built on vast uniform intensively managed industrial plantations established in place of “degraded” natural forests. Pearce’s book, and the insights from the eastern US, suggest that the real “cutting edge” may in fact lie in the hardwood sector, with its high dependence on smallholders and low-intensity harvesting of diverse natural forests, supported by networks of smaller wood processors, traders, and manufacturers, and making most efficient use of the wood that regenerates naturally.
It’s a matter of taste, but for me it’s a more inspiring vision of the future. ■
We don’t have to do the planting. We shouldn’t do the planting. Nature will mostly do it for us. And she will do it better. If we stand back and give them room, forests will regrow
www.ttjonline.com | July/August 2022 | TTJ
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85
