MHC Government Relations Committee Report

YOUR MARYLAND HORSE COUNCIL PUBLICATION by Kimberly K. Egan, MHC Government Relations Committee Te 2021 legislative session of

the Maryland General Assembly is underway, and the Maryland Horse Council’s Government Re- lations Committee has been hard at work reviewing the proposed legislation and identifying those bills that could affect the horse in- dustry. To date, the Horse Council has

taken written positions on two bills – one that would include therapy horses in the Maryland Veterans Service Animal Program, and one that would expand Sunday deer hunting in Queen Anne’s County.

Therapy Horses (SB 284/HB 660) Senator Bryan Simonaire (R – Anne Arundel County) introduced

legislation that would add a definition of “therapy horse” to the list of service animals eligible for reimbursement by the State’s Veterans Ser- vice Animal Program. Sen. Simonaire reached out to the Horse Council for help with the definition of “therapy horse.” We in turn reached out to the therapy horse community for input. Te bill had originally required stables to be Professional Association of

Terapeutic Horsemanship (PATH) Premier Accredited Centers (PAC) or to have Equine Assisted Growth and Learning Association (EAG- ALA) certified professionals on staff. MHC asked Sen. Simonaire to remove the PATH and EAGALA

requirements, which can be unnecessarily restrictive, and replace it with language that would define a “therapy horse” as “a horse determined ap- propriate for interactions with veterans by a Horse Discovery Center certified by the state that: (I) is individually trained to do work or per- form tasks for the benefit of an individual with a disability, including physical, sensory, psychiatric, intellectual, or other mental disability, or (II) serves as an emotional support or therapy animal that a medical professional, within the medical professional’s scope of practice, has de- termined provides benefit to an individual with a sensory, psychiatric, intellectual, or other mental disability.” Corinne Pouliquen testified on behalf of the MHC at the February 2 Senate committee hearing. As of press, we await further developments.

Queen Anne’s County Sunday Hunting (HB 225/SB 605) Delegate Steven Arentz (R – Eastern Shore) introduced legislation

that would allow hunting on private land on each Sunday of each game bird or game mammal season. Tis “all Sundays, all seasons, all species” approach would expand the number of Sundays available for just deer hunting from each Sunday during deer firearms season, and three Sun-

days in October and one in November during deer bow season, to almost all Sundays year-round for all species. Te Horse Council reached out to its membership in Queen Anne’s

County and filed written testimony opposing the bill. MHC has con- sistently opposed expansion of Sunday hunting because the majority of our members oppose it, and because MHC has tried for over 20 years to preserve Sundays as the one day of the week when children and adults, hikers, birdwatchers, dog walkers, trail riders and other outdoor enthu- siasts could enjoy the outdoors without concern for adverse interactions with hunters. Tis is especially so now that use of public natural resources has increased dramatically as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. MHC testified at the House committee hearing on February 3. As with the therapy horse bill, we await further developments.

Upcoming Bills MHC intends to testify on two other bills – a Sunday hunting bill in

Talbot County (HB 325) and a “cost of care” bill for animal shelters (HB 1080/SB 760). Te Talbot County bill would increase the available Sundays for deer hunting from only the first Sunday during firearms season and three Sundays in October and one in November during bow season, to all Sundays from October to January.

It would also add one Sunday in

turkey season. We anticipate making the same arguments as we did for the Queen Anne’s County bill. Te House committee hearing is Febru- ary 17. Te animal shelter cost of care bill would, generally speaking, require

the owners under investigation for animal cruelty to pay the costs of car- ing for the animal after the animal has been seized, or forfeit all rights to the animal. MHC has opposed such bills in the past because of due process concerns. MHC is considering a number of alternatives to propose to the spon- sors, and we intend to testify at the hearings, which are not yet scheduled.

Are you a policy wonk; politics junkie: or just interested in learning more about how your government works and how you can make a difference? Join us on the MHC PAC Board! Minimal time commitment (less than 10 hours a year). Help us decide how to wield our financial clout in Annapolis. Interested?


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60