This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
ANAEROBIC DIGESTION ENER-G


|


How to gain finance for your on-farm AD project


For the right project, the overall return on investment on anaerobic digestion can be excellent, says Ian Gadsby, Managing Director of ENER-G Natural Power


N


ew EU CAP rules for 2015, requiring greater crop diversification, are good news for farmers when it comes to


ensuring bankability of anaerobic digestion (AD) schemes. The ‘greening rules’ linked to payment of the new Basic Payment Scheme require some farms with more than 30 hectares (75 acres) of arable land to grow three different crops. By breaking crops with cereals, farmers can create a stable, long-term feedstock for an AD scheme, and attract higher value for that crop than would be traditionally achieved through the commodity markets.


Feeding the AD is critical When we examine the viability of investing in AD projects without a reliable, minimum 10-year feedstock supply, the project will not stand up. Another key factor is the availability of a ready outlet for the digestate. We also seek opportunities to capture and utilise the heat output from AD, therefore qualifying


for payments through the Renewable Heat Incentive (RHI). In an era of Feed in Tariff digression and the uncertainty that surrounds this, it is increasingly important for the more marginal projects to make up any shortfall via the RHI, and the returns are highly attractive.


Accessing finance For the right project, with heat and digestate demand and a robust feedstock pipeline, the overall return on investment on AD can be excellent. But accessing finance can be tricky, as evidenced by the high numbers of pre- accredited projects that are failing to launch. As the AD market matures, it is essential that technology providers adjust their pricing to reflect the proven market and the government tariffs available. With ENER-G’s experience of developing a total 170 MW of biogas generation projects, we are continually finding innovative new ways and economies of scale to drive costs down.


De-risking AD investment Our wide AD experience and proven technologies gives us the confidence to provide a fully or partially funded AD model. This flexible AD ENER-G finance model is attractive to landowners and farming businesses. We offer the de-risking of projects


22 REview Renewable Energy View 2015


for farmers that are not fully comfortable with investing, owning and operating their own AD facility. The flexibility of our model means we also welcome shared investment for those who want to split the benefits of the scheme directly, as well as offering to fully finance for those who want to host and supply the facility with feedstock without making any capital outlay. Among those farms partnering with ENER-G, organic cheese maker Lye Cross Farm has agreed to a 15-year feedstock contract. This gives ENER-G the security to invest in the design, installation and operation of the complete AD facility. This project will create renewable energy from lactose permeate and plant washings. The farm will take on responsibility for re- using the digestate – assisted by ENER-G, which is installing a system to separate solids and liquids – creating a valuable organic fertiliser from land spreading the solids. The liquid fraction will be recycled via an aeration system, with this treated water used to hydrate the farm’s dairy herd.


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Tel: 0161 745 7450; email: scott.tamplin@energ.co.uk www.energ.co.uk/biogas


www.r-e-a.net


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100