This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
NEW ZEALAND


select committee to enable New Zealanders to have a say … even if the process is truncated.” Legislation was introduced


under urgency on 25 November. It passed its first reading by 107 votes to 14 and was referred to the Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade Committee with a requirement that the select committee report the Bill back to the House by 2 December 2014. On 9 December 2014 Parliament sat under urgency to pass the Countering Terrorist Fighters Legislation Bill through its remaining stages. Key provisions in the omnibus Bill as reported back from the select committee included extending the maximum cancellation period of a passport from 12 months to three years, where the passport-holder poses a danger to New Zealand or another country, and increasing Security Intelligence Service powers, including the ability to conduct surveillance without a warrant for 24 hours in situations of emergency or urgency. Introducing the second


reading, Hon. Christopher Finlayson, MP, (National), said that the Bill’s amendments were very targeted and emphasised


that it was temporary legislation. Speaking in support of the Bill, Mr Andrew Little, MP, (Leader of the Opposition) referred to changes made at the select committee: “Through Labour’s representatives on


Rt Hon. John Key, Prime Minister


the Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade Committee… we challenged the need for the length of time for warrantless surveillance. It has been reduced to 24 hours… More important… are the safeguards that have now been built into any approval of surveillance without a warrant.”


Mr Little nevertheless criticised the truncated select committee process, saying: “when we are faced with legislation that erodes basic rights and freedoms, even in limited circumstances such as this Bill sets out, it is vital as a matter of public confidence that it is exposed to the fullest possible public scrutiny. That has not happened here.” Opposing the Bill, Dr


Ms Annette King, MP


Kennedy Graham, MP, (Green Party) criticised both the Bill’s intention and its process: “There is some cognitive dissonance between the excitable narrative and the official judgment. … No legislation addressing constitutional rights … should ever be


49 | The Parliamentarian | 2015: Issue One


subjected to this procedural abomination.” Rt Hon. Winston Peters, MP, (New Zealand First), agreed, saying: “to bring in a Bill and in two weeks take it from first reading through the final reading … is not good enough… It is against the democratic process of this House and against the right of New Zealanders to be properly consulted on and participate in legislation.” Mr Mark Mitchell, MP, (National) who chaired the select committee, acknowledged that “it may not [have been] a perfect process but it is not a perfect world, and sometimes we have to react quickly to a changing security environment”.


Mr David Shearer,


MP, (Labour) stressed the need to consult with ethnic communities when enacting such legislation. Hon. Phil Goff, MP, (Labour) agreed: “The real protections against


At the third reading Mr Finlayson said: “I take those matters very seriously and I pledge to work with local Muslim communities over the next period, including during the period of the broader review.” Noting the brief time that the select committee had to hear public submissions on this Bill, he added: “Any new legislation [will] be the product of an independent review … [and] will have a full hearing at the select committee.”


Subordinate Legislation (Confirmation and Validation Bill) The Subordinate Legislation (Confirmation and Validation) Bill passed its third reading without debate and with unanimous support on 4 December 2014 immediately after the second reading. Introducing the second


Rt Hon. Christopher Finlayson, MP


terrorism lie not [just] in legislation… but in having a harmonious and inclusive society; they lie in our moderate Muslim community, which is responsible and does the right thing; and they lie in our reputation internationally as a country that acts independently and has a sense of good international citizenship.”


reading, the Attorney- General, Hon. Christopher Finlayson, MP, (National) said: “This legislation confirms or validates 13 orders or regulations made under eight different Acts… to avoid their lapsing.” He referred to a recent change in the Standing Orders to streamline the process for scrutinizing this type of legislation, saying that he “look[ed] forward to testing the new arrangements with the 2015 Confirmation and Validation Bill.”


Under the new Standing


Order, there is no amendment to or debate on a first reading of this type of legislation and the Bill is referred to the Regulations Review Committee. Also Bills that confirm or validate subordinate legislation will normally proceed from second to third reading immediately, and there will be no debate on the third reading.


The Parliamentarian | 2015: Issue One | 49


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80