This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
BENCHMARKING


BENCHMARKS FOR CODES OF CONDUCT


Pioneering research shows that parliamentarians themselves recognise that rigorous codes of conduct and ethics make their institutions stronger


Hon. Dr Ken Coghill, PhD is an Associate Professor of Management at Monash University, Melbourne, Australia. He was a former Member of the Victoria Legislative Assembly, and also served as Parliamentary Secretary of the Cabinet and Speaker.


Dr Abel Kinyondo is a Senior Researcher at REPOA. He has also headed the Department of Geography and Economics at the University of Dar Es Salaam (DUCE) and previously worked for the United Nations Development Program in Tanzania.


xxx


of the project. A large majority responded; of those, about two- thirds reported that they have some form of code to guide the behaviour of the Members of their House.


Hon. Dr Ken Coghill, PhD


A code for Members is the mark of modern Commonwealth parliaments, according to research which is leading to benchmarks to guide parliaments in the design or revision of codes of conduct. This research and development project began in mid-2014, funded by the CPA and conducted by a research team based at Monash University (Melbourne, Australia). The CPA’s branches include around 200 houses of parliament (i.e. some are bicameral) which were surveyed as the first stage


38 | The Parliamentarian | 2015: Issue One


Parliamentarians and Clerks from a large cross-section of houses were then interviewed at the 60th Commonwealth Parliamentary Conference (Yaoundé, Cameroon, October 2014) to get a deeper understanding of how codes operate in practice. This led to draft benchmarks which were published on Commonwealth Connects and circulated in February for comment by parliamentarians, clerks and other experts, leading to a workshop in April. This will be followed by publication of Recommended Benchmarks for Codes of Conduct.


Key research findings The first key observation is that a code forms an important part of the parliamentary integrity system (discussed in


Dr Abel Kinyondo


“Conduct, Ethics and Codes” The Parliamentarian, Issue One, 2014)


A second key finding was the strong view from parliaments with more rigorous codes that their parliaments were better as a result. The reasons for that seem to go to the very heart of democracy. Parliament is a public office and members of any parliament are public officers. As such, parliamentarians have a fiduciary relationship with the people of the nation, province, state, or territory served by


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80