News ... and there’s more!
Hong Kong researchers express their concerns about artificial turf in comprehensive heat stress study
The first comprehensive study on heat stress and artificial turf in Hong Kong raises some serious concerns.
Data compiled by Professor Jim Chi-yung, chair professor of geography at the University of Hong Kong, shows that the surface temperature of artificial turf can be ninety percent hotter than the air temperature in summer, and that athletes and children are particularly vulnerable to heat stress and the risk of heat stroke. This adds to concerns that artificial turf can intensify urban temperatures, contributing to the heat island effect.
According to Chi-yung’s data, the surface temperature of artificial turf in 35°C heat can shoot up to a sizzling 70°C, whilst natural turf peaks no higher than 38°C. Chi-Yung also found that the air temperature 50cm above ground was higher than temperatures at 150cm, meaning small children were at greater risk to high heat exposure.
The research also found that heat stress - the effect of heat in generating pressure or discomfort on the body - to be far greater on artificial turf pitches than natural grass pitches. “A human being will not be feeling just the air temperature but the heat sensation,” Chi-yung said.
He spent two summers collecting data at the university’s Stanley Ho Sports complex in Sandy Bay, over the course of ten consecutive days, with a heat stress monitoring system comprising infrared radiometers and temperature sensors at different levels from the ground.
“Natural grass pitches serve important ecosystem purposes and help mitigate the urban heat island effect - the increase in temperatures in urban areas compared with suburban areas due to urbanisation. Water evaporation from natural turf produced a cooling effect,” Chi-yung said. He criticised the policy of replacing natural turf with artificial grass, noting that the trend in cities such as Singapore and in Japan was to convert more hard ground into grass.
“It is very disappointing that, whilst every developed country is working to reduce the urban heat island effect, the government here is doing things to intensify it,” he said.
Although The Leisure and Cultural Services Department in Hong Kong is committed to replacing most natural grass pitches with artificial ones to raise “availability and quality” - and reduce maintenance costs, Chi-yung isn’t the only person expressing concerns over such a decision.
Professor Jim Chi-yung - serious concerns about heat stress
Professor Edward Ng Yung-yan, an expert in sustainable architecture and urban climatology at Chinese University, is quoted as saying, even if thermal effects were localised and not directly related to the urban heat island of an entire city, there was no running away from the fact that more natural grass would help to cool down a city.
“The key scientific reason is water evaporation,” Yung-yan said, pointing out that evapotranspiration cools both the turf and the air above. “Real grass, not the fake stuff, has a cooling benefit for entire neighbourhoods.” Ng said studies had shown that grass cools the surrounding air by about one degree and reduces radiation temperature by 20 to 30 degrees.
“Real grass is harder to maintain, but it’s not impossible,” Yung-yan said. "While other cities are moving from the concept of ‘garden in a city’ to ‘city in a garden’, we are reversing the trend entirely."
As featured in The South China Morning Post -
http://t.co/tcaybwxAgd
PC DECEMBER/JANUARY 2016 I 7
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156