07 Diary


ARE YOU A CHATTY DENTIST?


Speaking with colleagues during treatment can be an unexpected source of patient complaints


T


HERE are many risk areas for new dentists to consider, but holding a conversation may not be among the most obvious. However, analysis of a recent MDDUS complaint fi le suggests


that it is worth highlighting. In this case, a patient had taken umbrage that, during her


consultation, her dentist had conducted an entire conversation in Spanish with his dental nurse. While you may forgive someone for having an opportunistic shot at brushing up on their foreign language skills, it transpired that both the dentist and the nurse were in fact Spanish. The case raises an interesting point about exactly what patients think in general about their dentists chatting with their dental nurses while administering their treatment. You may think that most people would take a rather dim view of the practice but, after a quick search on Google, it appears opinion in this area is more of a mixed bag.


The internet chat forum, Digital Spy, threw up the following comments:


• “ANYTHING to take my mind off what’s going on in my mouth!”


• “Some people will see it as rude and unprofessional, while other people might actually fi nd it a bit comforting, as it will ‘humanise’ the dentist a bit more.”


• “Personally, if the dentist does a good job on your tooth and isn’t talking about anything they shouldn’t be (e.g. other patients) then I don’t see the problem.”


• “I don’t mind it when they chat to the nurse, but I hate it when they talk to me while working on my teeth, and all I can do is grunt in reply!”


• “It’s completely wrong and totally unprofessional, and I’m sure it’s not part of their training at dental school.”


• “What about inappropriate conversation with the patient? I went to one a number of years ago who, referring to something he was glancing at in a magazine as I walked in, told me that he had once let out his dental room in South Africa to a liposuction clinic, and some woman had died on ‘his’ chair there through bleeding to death. All this as I was about to have an extraction.”


Putting aside the rather extreme nature of the last post, the


comments do seem to suggest that a lot of patients will either not mind at all, or even fi nd some comfort and reassurance in the spontaneous banter. So is there a line that should not be crossed and, if so, where do the risks lie? Complaint generation would seem to be the obvious risk, especially if the patient perceives that they are being ignored or simply treated as a unit of income. MDDUS case fi les in this respect show that it’s not only the initial complaint that becomes problematic for the dentist, but also in the way that it is subsequently handled and responded to. Especially if the dentist does not recognise or accept any issue or harm in what took place. Other cases MDDUS has responded to include frankly


inappropriate and off ensive comments being passed between the dentist and the dental nurse. What might seem like a bit of harmless banter and fun might cause a lot of off ence if taken out of context (or sometimes even literally). We dealt with one such case recently where a patient accused the male dentist of making sexually off ensive remarks to his nurse, even though the nurse made no complaint and seemed to have taken no off ence. This one found its way to the General Dental Council and resulted in a severe censure for the dentist. Another risk involves the inadvertent disclosure of third-party


identifi cation or breach of another patient’s confi dentiality, either through thoughtless social chat, or specifi c discussion about another patient’s treatment. And, believe it or not, it does happen. A further area of concern could revolve around the actual


treatment the patient receives. If it can be shown that the dentist was distracted by unnecessary conversation leading to sub-standard treatment, then compensation may indeed be due. So far, I’ve only mentioned the dynamics between the dentist and


their patient, but when you consider the ramifi cations of the Equality Act 2010, and employment law in general, then the consequences for employers’ liability also comes into play. So, where does this all leave us? Taking some of the posted


comments at face value, some of your patients would appear to welcome and even embrace a light-hearted conversation taking place over the top of them. I would suspect that the majority of supportive comments have


been posted by individuals working from a rational state of mind, however once you factor in anxiety and even pain to the mix then emotionally motivated individuals may not be as receptive to a throwaway remark, even one made with humorous intent.


Alan Frame is a risk adviser at MDDUS Risk •


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16