Public Order policing T
he majority of experts in global risk predict that we will continue to see
protest in response to the economic climate and austerity measures. The potential for this form of protest to lead to violence, damage to business property and assets, impact on reputation and ultimately profit will always exist.
After a period of relative quiet in public order terms, there has been an increase in protest activity across the UK, including the UK Uncut protests, G20, TUC march and a number of protests over student fees and, of course, the August Riots in 2011. The nature of protest constantly evolves, as does the methodology of those groups who intentionally push the boundaries of the law or engage in criminality.
This is a new era of public order policing, one where efficient communication tools are widely available to all. These are being used effectively by those wishing to cause disruption and this ability to coordinate activity and to react quickly tests the police’s ability to provide an effective response. As ever, within some groups there is a willingness to disrupt the public and confront the police; recently, this has included coordinated direct action against retail premises, government
buildings and/or iconic sites, occasionally resulting in criminal activity. Protestors are more able to adapt quickly to police tactics, using modern technology previously unavailable.
The majority of protests in the UK are peaceful, and under Human Rights legislation should be facilitated. On average there are over 4,000 ‘events’ in London each year, with only a small percentage being disorderly. However, it is always possible that individuals attending may not be intent on holding a peaceful protest; consequently, business needs to be prepared.
A common problem of recent years is shop or business premises incursions by small groups of protestors, with the intention of gaining some publicity for their cause. When faced with this threat I always advise a calm, firm but friendly approach, as the event is often being recorded for a news programme and the company’s reputation will be impacted by the first interaction. Do not provide them with additional publicity by your actions. If protests are taking place within private property, the police see the primary responsibility for the security of the property and the management of any trespass within the premises as being that of the land
owner/company. Simply opening a shop or stores for business implies invitation to all persons to enter to shop. The manager or representative of the company / premises can withdraw this invitation at any time. It is certainly good practice to have an agreed form of words to use in this situation. Should there be an incursion into your premises which is not disorderly and police are requested to attend, it should be stressed that this is likely not to be a criminal trespass. The expectations of the officers attending will be to witness a representative of the premises request those trespassing to leave. If asked to assist in the ejection of these persons, police are acting as an agent of the company and have no more powers and privileges than that of an ordinary member of the public.
A security
partnership that’s built to succeed
Incentive Lynx Security
44 Loman Street, London, SE1 0EH Tel: 020 7979 7766
Email:
info@incentive-lynx.com www.incentive-lynx.com
26 Advertisements
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40