This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Ü GETTING STARTED


Experts said one way to begin the KPI data tracking process is by gathering inter- nal data to establish a safety measure, a reliability measure and an efficiency measure.


Safety: Number of Acci-


dents. Record the number of accidents daily. Define acci- dents simply or in accordance with your state reporting definition.


Reliability: Number of


Road Calls. Track the total number of road calls each day. First, define a road call. This could be as simple as tracking an interruption in service. Tally these daily, and total them monthly and then annually. You now have a benchmark to compare with in the coming year.


Efficiency: Track the rider- ship or number of students riding the bus monthly. GPS programs make student tracking easier, but bus driv- ers can track actual ridership on a monthly basis without GPS. Pick the same day each month. Have each driver count the number of kids on the morning trip and the number on the afternoon trip. Divide the morning and after- noon total by two to establish an average.


to accommodate for the growth and, as a result, justifying the need for emergency buses. Her next step involved adopting formal metrics. She


adopted the Metropolitan Area Transportation Efficiency Study (MATES), which features its own set of KPIs for school transportation that a number of school districts in Colorado utilize. Like Karam, Dunbar began to see results in her fleet management expenditures. “It allowed me to increase my mechanic-to-bus ratio,


and safety plays into that,” she said, noting that many of the buses in her 108-bus fleet are 20-plus years old. She also was able to staff her training department, and increase her ratio of drivers to training and safety coordinators. She added that the most unique thing about MATES


was how it collects the basic data of her fleet. “It gave me enough information to calculate my cost per mile to be more current than what the district was charging outside entities, such as charter schools,” she said. “Te success for me is to understand the cost to get reimbursement owed to the fleet.”


TECHNOLOGY AS A KEY PLAYER Karam found his staff eager to learn about KPIs, but he


realized that other personnel, or even transportation direc- tors and supervisors, might be intimidated by KPIs. “Maybe some aren’t good at math, and that may hold them back,” he said, but added that routing software can help in this area. Regardless of manufacturer, routing software technology


today offers real-time information on what’s going on in operations. Te field of transportation is filled with data, and that’s where technology can enter the scene, said John Fahey, a consultant for Tyler Technologies’ Versatrans prod- uct who also leads the technology group of NAPT’s KPI Task Force launched last year. Technology offers the various “what if ” scenarios, so it can provide as little or as much data as one wants. “Tis pressure on districts to be as efficient as possible is


not going away, it will only be intensified,” Fahey said. Transportation departments that still use pencil and paper


can still begin their KPI process with a few pieces of data. Karam explained, “Even if it’s one or two items, you can get that going in no time, and then it’s easy to maintain.” 


KPI


STANDARDS Effort on Route


NAPT’s KPI Task Force


is progressing with its goal of establishing a set list of KPI terms to be adopted industry-wide to help districts of all siz- es compare themselves to others in their league. Peter Lawrence, team leader of the NAPT Task Force’s Research group and director of transpor- tation at Fairport (N.Y) Central School District, said the group was ready to field test all the current definitions with the group's 100-plus volunteer members. “One of our goals


A CURRENT LIST OF KPIS THE NAPT KPI TASK FORCE IS REVIEWING. THE GROUP IS ALSO WORKING ON OTHER KPIS RELATED TO COSTS AND STAFFING.


• Average age of fleet • Runs per bus • Annual training hours • Students per run • Spare bus ratio • Students per bus • Students per run • Actual/Eligible students transported


ROUTING SOFTWARE PROVIDERS THAT CAN HELP


BusBoss busboss.com


EasyBus easybus.com


Education Logistics edulog.com


Transfinder Corporation transfinder.com


TransTraks transtraks.com


Trapeze Group trapezegroup.com


Tyler Technologies tylertech.com


U.S. Computing uscomputinginc.com


is to mirror definitions created by the Nation- al Congress on School Transportation,” he said. “The NCST is our indus- try’s bible, and we would like to see these KPIs eventually adopted by the NCST in 2015.” Robert Streeter, team leader of the feedback group and transpor- tation director for the Dysart Unified School District in Surprise, Ariz., noted that since the Task Force presented at the NAPT Summit last fall, the number of industry volunteers increased by almost 40 percent. “I believe that the more we get the message out about KPIs, the more people will be onboard,” said Streeter, who used KPIs before entering into student transportation and won the industry’s 2012 Larson Award.


52 School Transportation News April 2013


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60