This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
SPONSORS OF THE OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE FEATURE


UNDERSTANDING SUBSEA CABLE CHALLENGES


Subsea cabling procurement and installation is estimated to account for around 16% of total capital expenditure for offshore wind projects, representing a significant investment. For developers, cabling brings a multitude of challenges and risks, and cabling issues are thought to account for around 80% of all offshore wind insurance claims.


Seabed intervention of both manmade and natural origin creates a hostile, dynamic environment, and protection methods such as burial, mattressing, and armouring are employed to help ensure the integrity of the cable and ultimately, energy stability (For further reference, see page 78 of the previous issue of this publication, where Wood Group Kenny discuss cable protection systems in detail).


pipelines, and assist in the identification of sensitive benthic habitats.


DETAILED INFORMATION A clear understanding of the conditions the cable is likely to be subjected to allows the final route and burial depth to be selected with greater confidence that the integrity of the cable will remain intact. The detailed information received by the client reduces uncertainty, and helps in ‘de- risking’ the challenging installation phase.


POST INSTALLATION Following cable installation, surveys are conducted to assess horizontal positioning, areas of exposure or movement and depth of burial. While undoubtedly interested in overall cable integrity, developers are particularly concerned with the depth of burial achieved.


Forming part of their consenting conditions developers must often conform to a blanket depth of burial; commonly around 2m. Unless a detailed, independent survey is conducted the only information available to developers is that which is provided by their trenching and burial contractor. This can be a laborious process, and survey contractors are continually exploring ways to increase efficiency in this area.


This has led Osiris Projects to investigate remotely operated


PRE-CONSTRUCTION SURVEYS Pre-construction cable route surveys comprising both acoustic and intrusive methods are performed to determine the safest and most economically viable route, and can provide a baseline for post-construction inspection activity. This information also informs decisions regarding protection measures required to meet the conditions of the route.


At Osiris Projects, a large element of their work within offshore wind involves inter-array and consented export cable route corridor surveys. Following desktop studies of existing available data, they undertake reconnaissance and detailed surveys comprising geophysical, acoustic, geotechnical and ground-truthing methods to assess site characteristics, potential hazards such as unexploded ordnance or wrecks, the location of existing cables and


62 www.windenergynetwork.co.uk


‘seabed crawlers’ for such inspection and monitoring work.


SURGEON TRACKED INSPECTION ROV In 2012 they procured a Surgeon Tracked Inspection ROV from Global Marine Systems specifically for cable inspection and depth of burial operations. With a weight in air of 3 tonnes, the system can reach sea water depths of 100m and benefits from a full surveillance suite featuring 3 cameras, an obstacle avoidance sonar and a survey quality depth sensor as well as a various depth of burial profilers.


The overriding benefit of the track-driven system is the ability to function within a wider environmental window in the challenging UK coastal environment, when compared with free-flying ROVs. The track- driven ROV is mobilised with a Teledyne TSS 350 for cable tracking, which utilises


This is the outcome of a wider on-going R&D project involving a similar ROV concept. Osiris Projects are currently finalising the development of their own compact, state of the art Crawler ROV specifically for depth of burial analysis surveys.


The system will provide a unique opportunity to undertake large-scale pipe/ cable depth of burial analysis extremely cost effectively, when mobilised to their DP1 catamaran, ‘Bibby Tethra’.


NEW CHALLENGES As offshore wind moves further offshore, it is no secret subsea cabling contractors across the supply chain will face new challenges. Notably, distance to shore clearly becomes an issue, and current installation methods such as burial ploughs, sleds and tracked burial ROVs are confronted with an increasingly dynamic and inhospitable seabed environment. Knowledge and experience can continue to be drawn from the oil and gas industry, with subsea contractors already driving this discussion.


This will inevitably be a demanding learning curve, but the UK is well- positioned to lead and take ownership of this process.


Osiris Projects www.osirisprojects.co.uk


advanced pulse induction and digital signal processing technology to accurately determine ranges of buried cables.


DETAILED DATA Resultant data is supplied to the support vessel via the ROV’s umbilical where all navigation and depth of burial data is logged by the survey computer. These results are logged and displayed in real time, with an option to be overlaid on the ROV video footage.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108