Should I Reduce Residue To Reduce Disease? URBANA, ILL.
Q
uestion: “Farmer’s seem really tired of fighting foliar diseases in corn. Would plowing everything
under solve the problem?” The presence of some foliar corn dis-
eases is partially explained by the presence of “residue.” However, that increase is not completely explained by the presence of residue and for some diseases the presence of residue does not even factor into the appear- ance of disease. This makes a hypo- thetical “plowing it all under” tenuous at best. Some foliar diseases overwinter
somewhere other than residue. South- ern Rust and common rust overwinter in the southern part of North America. Maize Chlorotic Dwarf Virus and Maize Dwarf Virus pass from the fall to the spring within grass weeds (John- songrass, in particular). Stewart’s Wilt overwinters within the gut of corn flea beetles. Sorghum Downy Mildew over- winters in the soil. Other foliar corn
Sales Agreements CONTINUED FROM PAGE 3
bushel since Friday. Support is at $6.17 with resistance at $6.59 a bushel. Tech- nical indicators have changed to a buy bias. Weekly exports were below expecta- tions at 15.7 million bushels (15.4 million bushels for 2011/12 and .3 million bushels for 2012/13). Ukraine did an- nounce they were halting new export sales due to production concerns. New Crop: July wheat closed at $6.59 ½
a bushel, up 11 ¼ cents since last week. Support is at $6.39 with resistance at
$6.71 a bushel. Technical indicators have changed to a sell bias. Drier than normal conditions now and forecast for continued dry conditions in the Upper Plains and parts of Canada through the end of May have offered support for wheat prices. Wheat has also benefited from the in- crease in corn and soybean prices. I am currently 10 percent priced for the 2012 crop.
∆ CHUCK DANEHOWER: Extension
Area Specialist/Farm Management, Uni- versity of Tennessee
diseases overwinter in residue “plus” another location. Common smut, Crazy Top, and Physoderma all winter in residue, but they also persist in the soil. These two categories of foliar corn disease (those that overwinter some- where other than residue and those that overwinter in residue and the soil) will not be influenced by variations in tillage. One can destroy all the residue they want, but these diseases “tough it out” somewhere else. This stands in contrast to diseases like Northern Corn Leaf Blight and Gray Leaf Spot that do primarily overwinter in residue. Growers should also remember that
“plowing it all under” brings some po- tentially devastating consequences. First, eliminating residue can saddle the grower with substantial input costs. One need look no further than U of I Machinery Cost Estimates to find evidence of such costs. Moldboard plowing (the best way to eliminate a lot of residue) is the most expensive op-
tion on that sheet. In fact, it surpasses the next most expensive tillage tech- nique (mulch tillage) by roughly $10 per acre. Second, producers don’t “plow it under” because eliminating residue might eventually saddle the agricultural industry with painful con- sequences. Phosphorus typically passes into surface water as high ve- locity water drags phosphorus-laden soil from the field. Residue slows down that velocity and decreases erosive soil loss that contributes to phosphorus- derived water quality issues. “Plow it all under” would quickly translate into nutrient regulation. In other words, "plowing it all under" would cost grow- ers too much, both individually and corporately. Could other residue reduction meth-
ods solve the problem? Some have pro- posed the application of fall nitrogen to more rapidly degrade residue. The jury is still out on the true effective- ness of this approach, and many won- der if enough residue could really be eliminated pre-freeze to reduce dis- ease? A lower cost, more reliable, and less potentially troublesome method by which to reduce residue would be crop rotation. Rotation, less popular than it once was, would allow corn residue to decay over the course of a season, it would move the field away from host plant material, and it would
decrease the amount of material avail- able to overwinter pathogens going into the next corn-growing season.
Would “plowing it all under” elimi-
nate the “real” disease problem? Residue has allowed inoculum to build in corn fields over time, but the pres- ence of disease causing pathogens means nothing unless a susceptible host is present. When one considers the recent rise of once obscure corn diseases (Northern Corn Leaf Blight, Goss’s Wilt, Diplodia, Etc.), one is forced to wonder about the industry’s recent disease vigilance. Our love for certain hybrids to the exclusion of all others has probably allowed some pathogens to find a niche in which they can reside. The 2005 Field Guide to Corn Diseases notes another poten- tial explanation. That resource states the problem as follows…”In recent years, Gray Leaf Spot, Northern Corn Leaf Blight, and Diplodia Ear Rot have become problems because many elite hybrid germplasm pools” (the stuff from which our hybrids are derived) struggle with “resistance to…these dis- eases.” Yes, residue does provide an overwintering site for some foliar corn diseases, but many of these diseases have reappeared because we have a little work to do on the resistance front.
∆
Subscribe Today! Mail or Fax In Form Below
www.mafg.net or
www.jamarmfg.com
February 24, 2012 / MidAmerica Farmer Grower • 5
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32