August 2011 MAINE COASTAL NEWS Page 9. Commercial Fishing News Snowe Urges Considerations of Fishing Gear Regulations
WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Senator Olympia J. Snowe is urging the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) to thoroughly consider the operational and economic impacts of any new regulations to protect whales from becoming entangled in fishing gear. Senator Snowe, the Ranking Member of the Commerce subcommittee on Oceans, Atmosphere, Fisheries, and Coast Guard, says NMFS must account for practical problems associated with gear regulations in Maine’s fisheries to ensure any new rules provide for the greatest protection of marine life without unnecessarily burdening Maine’s fishermen with costly or ineffective requirements.
Senator Snowe said, “Regulatory efforts must focus on positive outcomes without placing unnecessary restrictions on Maine’s $300 million lobster fishery. Those whose livelihoods depend on the fishery are most connected to effective management techniques. I welcome NMFS to Maine this week to hear first-hand from our fishermen their concerns and innovative solutions to this difficult problem. I urge the agency to fully analyze the range of options, and avoid a one-size-fits-all regulatory approach. NMFS should instead utilize its co-occurrence model in order to most effectively and safely reduce incidents of gear entanglement off our northeastern coastlines with the least possible impact to the fishing industry.”
As the former Chair and now Ranking member on the Senate’s Commerce Committee subcommittee on Oceans, Atmosphere, Fisheries and Coast Guard, Senator Snowe has been a longtime champion of commonsense regulations that do not impose unnecessary or needlessly onerous restrictions on Maine’s fishermen. The Atlantic Large Whale Take Reduction Plan (ALWTRP) was implemented in 1997 to reduce incidents of fishing gear entanglement of large whales. From 2005 to 2007, NMFS developed a rule to reduce risk of whale entanglement in groundlines, including a requirement for the use of sinking groundlines in the lobster fishery. In 2006, Senator Snowe requested a study by the nonpartisan Government Accountability Office (GAO) on those proposed strategies to mitigate entanglement. At a field hearing in Brewer in February 2008, Senator Snowe examined GAO’s final report, which concluded that NMFS could not estimate the extent to which entanglement risks would be reduced by the proposed regulation, did not adequately represent the uncertainties associated with the cost of proposed gear modifications and therefore could not fully assess the potential impacts on fishing
communities. Following that hearing,
Senator Snowe said, “It is no exaggeration to say that these rules will likely compromise the viability of the industry in large areas of our state…”
Senator Snowe’s prepared statement for the record: These four meetings provide a critical opportunity for Maine fishermen to weigh in on substantive changes that may greatly affect their fishing practices, and I appreciate NOAA’s efforts to reduce the distance they will have to travel to provide comment. I commend the fishermen present, as well, for taking time away from your work and families to attend. Your insights and expertise are the foundation for our collective ability to reach a workable outcome in this process.
Ultimately, it is imperative that we balance the protections of the Marine Mammal Protection Act and Endangered Species Act with both the economics and operational practicalities of Maine’s iconic lobster fishery. As Ranking Member of the Subcommittee on Oceans, Atmosphere, Fisheries and Coast Guard, I look forward to working closely with the National Marine Fisheries Service, as I have in the past, to assure that Maine’s fishermen are treated equitably, and their innovative solutions to this complex problem are given full consideration.
For fifteen years, Maine’s fixed gear fishermen have been subject to regulations intended to reduce entanglement risk, including gear modifications, dynamic area management and seasonal area management measures. Fresh in our collective memories are the changes that went into effect in April 2009, when the National Marine Fisheries Service imposed a requirement to use sinking groundlines throughout the trap fishery outside the exemption line. Unfortunately, analysis of that rule was severely lacking. In 2006, I requested a Government Accountability Office evaluation of the proposed strategies—and the results were unacceptable. The report— which we discussed during a field hearing I chaired in Brewer in February 2008— concluded that NMFS could not estimate the extent to which entanglement risks would be reduced by the proposed regulations, did not adequately represent the uncertainties associated with the cost of proposed gear modifications and therefore could not fully assess the potential impacts on fishing communities. As if that was not enough, the report also found NMFS had not resolved implementation challenges or developed strategies for evaluating effectiveness of the regulations. It is any wonder that fishermen are wary of beginning the next round of discussions?
After much debate, implementation of that rule, originally set to go into effect in October 2008, was delayed six months to address the industry’s realities—an inadequate supply of sink rope, and the economic hardship caused by rigging over so much gear in the most lucrative part of the season. With recent history underscoring so many concerns with this process, it is imperative that NMFS address these information gaps immediately and proactively going forward.
That is why it is critical that the fishing industry is engaged early to help identify options that will be feasible and safe under working conditions at sea. I expect that the agency will to seek to work more collaboratively with fishermen during this rulemaking to identify feasible options. Focusing the discussion, as the agency has, on risk reduction, rather than a specific target percentage reduction in vertical line, gives fishermen the opportunity to proactively guide the development of options and tell National Marine Fisheries Service what works for them.
As a long-time supporter of finer-scale approaches to the issue of whale entanglement, I am very encouraged by NOAA’s use of the co-occurrence model to guide the development of this rule. Broad- brush regulations will fail both the fishermen and the whales. We must focus our efforts where they can produce positive results for conservation of marine mammals, as well as the least harm to Maine’s lobster fishery, which landed 93 million pounds in 2010 at a value of 310 million dollars. Conservative estimates of the economic impact of fisheries on the state’s economy doubles the landings value, and the ex-vessel price being paid for Maine lobster has been strong this
year. Clearly, there is a great deal at stake, especially in a difficult economy, in the development of any regulations that may adversely affect the lobster industry. Maine’s active industry associations, research foundations, and Department of Marine Resources have been laying the groundwork for a state proposal, doing research and working with the industry over multi-day workshops, at zone council meetings and kitchen tables to identify targeted, pragmatic ways to reduce the risk of entanglement. I applaud their efforts, and will continue to support them in every step of this process until we reach a plan that provides for the recovery of endangered species without putting our state’s historic fishery at risk. I continue to believe we can achieve both of those outcomes, and will work tirelessly toward that objective.
WANTED
MARITIME BOOKS, MAGAZINES, DOCUMENTS POSTCARDS and
PHOTOGRAPHS International
Maritime Library P.O. Box 710
Winterport, Maine 04496 (207) 223-8846
MAINE Maritime Academy
Maine’s coastal college of engineering, science, and management
www.mainemaritime.edu
1-800-464-6565 (Maine) 1-800-227-8465 (Out-of-State)
218 Bucksport Road, Ellsworth, ME 04605 (207) 667-9390
72 Commercial Street, Maine Wharf, Portland, ME 04101 (207) 772-6383
Marine Safety Equipment
Life Rafts and Life Raft Repacking EPIRBS · Topo Maps · Charts Inflatable Boats and Repair Survival Suits · PFDs
124
prexar.com
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32