MOSS BOSS? I
Moss control and eradication - one man’s variation on Mother Nature’s Anhydrous Syndrome
By Ian Macmillan BSc Ba (hon) MG
hope that you are wondering if this ‘Anhydrous Syndrome’ actually exists. That being the case I have successfully grabbed your attention. When Laurence rang me up and suggested I contribute a small article on moss control I was to agree with a measure of reluctance. To try and fashion, yet again, another article on this very ubiquitous and repetitive subject has measures of difficulty. A rolling stone gathers no moss; but can we say that about an impoverished green though? So, fellow practitioners, here is our starting point. Tom Cruise turned this mission down; fundamentally it has required more thought than action. Morphological, physiological, and biological aspects are all pertinent and could be considered a rightful starting point to any moss disorder. However, as most cited articles are directed towards cultural control then that is where I will start and finish, but my direction will lean to a slightly different angle to hopefully establish a slightly better control. You decide?
Moss; what is it?
Moss is a tiny, leafy-stemmed, flowerless plant of the class Musci, reproducing by spores and also asexually from displacement from fragments which are carried over fine turf, soil, rocks, and tree trunks. All having one fundamental constant, water. This free water, which remains the catalyst for its establishment, becomes the link to its dissipation but let us be fully clear on this. The water I categorise refers to the free surface water which is in direct contact with the surface spores, and not to ground water which has more of a part in the plant’s physiological survival. As this is important, let me repeat this, the water I categorise refers to the free surface water which is in direct contact with surface spores, and it is to this that my slightly different angle comes in, which allows me to expound my hypotheses, as indeed I have successfully trialed them.
So, where do we go from here? Well, this is where the Anhydrous Syndrome has served me and could be considered of cultural benefit. Let us make an assumption that we have looked at, and corrected, all the obligatory checklists of cultural methods. We’ve done the shade bit through to nutrition yet we still repeatedly encounter the annual response of moss that visits our surfaces, so what eludes us? Why are repeat prescriptions always necessary? The elusive answers to
this can only be considered to be locked in the vaults of Mother Nature. My trials have concluded that, if we
remove the surface film of water from direct contact with the reproduction facility (the spores), then we can gain the upper hand to its control and eradication, but how? Well, I have secured much success in this operation by using hydroscopic agents that physically absorb the free water from the spores to a state of dehydration. In this disadvantaged state the spores readily die off cutting off the very source that enables the moss to spread throughout the sward. In this much weakened physiological
state the plant is readily reduced by the beneficial micro organisms, allowing the grass to grow through creating, once again, an entire botanical composition of grass. If you recall a recent message board post on moss it was suggested that Epsom salts have the ability to play a significant part in the desiccation. This underused agent, when spread in granular form, has a profound effect on the absorption of the surface free water. Highly hydroscopic, it readily mops the film from the sphere shrouding the plants spores. Although the moss plant can survive 80% dehydration, the spores detect a difference and are readily killed off when the free water is withdrawn, soon to succumb and perish to this transitional state of moisture loss. With the reproduction catalyst removed the plant loses its ability to further spread, leaving it in a weak and vulnerable state of health. Hydroscopic agents have the ability to achieve this and I have trialled many with much success. This should, however, not be considered an alternative to profile drainage and, as such, a good drainage system is mandatory in all aspects of grass health. Other mandatory work would include, adequate and timely aeration practices, including a soil flocculation prescription (flocculation for another day!), a regulated nutritional programme, air flow and shade management, cutting frequencies and heights, all of which serve to hinder but not necessarily eradicate this unwanted visitor. Now, if you do decide to try out the
Anhydrous Syndrome then you must choose a period of dry weather where no precipitation is expected for at least forty eight hours. Surfaces must be brushed and all free water displaced well away from the spores. This, in turn, will facilitate a quicker dehydration of the reproduction mode of the moss. Let’s summarise. My synopsis is
directed through my own experiments. They are my trials, my applications, and my positive results, yes they are positive, and, yes, they work. However, let’s be clear on a possible disadvantage, and this will depend greatly on the type of hydroscopic agent you use, and depending on product an imbalance can occur.
If we determine to use salts, for instance, a variation on conductivity and chemical variations are possible. If we use calcium carbonates PH and other values could be compromised? Allow me, once again, to be perfectly clear on this - the variations would only be attributed to excess and not on single applications. All in all, a prerequisite of good moss control can only be attributed to an active and rolling management regime where the turf practitioner is seen to be active in the dynamics of its regression and desiccation. A rolling stone gathers no moss, but a
delay in structured application certainly does. For those readers who suffer moss
problems, I very much hope that my advice will be of use. Goodbye moss, hello green sunshine. Yours in agronomy, Ian Macmillan MG.
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132