This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
THERMAL LENS SPECTROMETRY continued


Table 2 – Comparison of proposed method with reported methods using CPE prior to rhodium determination Reagent


5-(4´-Nitro-2´,6´-dichlorophenylazo)-6- hydroxypyrimidine-2,4-dione





Detection system* SP


FAAS


2-Propylpiperidine-1-carbodithioate FAAS O,O-diethyl-dithiophosphate 2-Mercaptobenzothiazole 1-(2-Pyridylazo)-2-naphthol


2-(3,5-Dichloro-2-pyridylazo)-5-di- methylaminoaniline


TLS


ICP/MS ICP/MS TLS


Surfactant Triton X-114 Span 80**


Triton X-114 Triton X-114 Triton X-100 Triton X-114


Triton X-114


*SP, spectrophotometry; FAAS, flame atomic absorption spectrometry. **Span 80 nonionic surfactant from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, Mo.).


DL (ng∙mL-1 0.15 1.2


0.052 0.003 0.001 0.06


0.04 )


Ref. 30


31 32


33 34 21


Present work


Table 3 – Determination of rhodium in water samples Sample no.*


Sample W100301 Tap water


2.0 3.0


— W100302 Tap water


1.0 4.0


— W100303 Well water


1.0 3.0


— W100304 Well water


*W100301: The concentration of Fe3+ 50 ng mL-1


than 200, 50, 50, 50 and 30 ng mL-1 and Cd2+ Fe3+


were 230, 50 and 30 ng mL-1


1.0 4.0


and Mn2+


Added (ng/mL) —


Found (ng/mL) ND


1.93, 1.87, 1.97 1.89, 2.05, 2.04 3.02, 2.97, 2.86 2.89, 2.95, 3.03 ND


1.03, 0.98, 1.04 1.00, 1.04, 0.98 3.95, 4.06, 3.98 3.95, 3.90, 4.05 ND


1.06, 1.05, 0.990 1.08, 1.06, 1.01 2.86, 3.00, 2.90 2.85, 2.92, 2.88 ND


0.980, 0.950, 1.04 0.960, 1.02, 0.980 4.08, 3.82, 3.90 3.90, 3.95, 4.00


was 30 and 10 ng mL-1


Fe3+ were lower than 200, 50, 50, 50 and 30 ng mL-1 , and Pb2+


, Zn2+ and Cd2+ in the water sample, respectively. W100302: The concentration of Mn2+


Average (ng/mL) Recovery (%) —





1.96 2.95





1.01 3.98





1.04 2.90





0.988 3.94


, respectively, and Pb2+ , Cu2+ was 10 ng mL-1 , Zn2+ , and Pb2+ in the water sample, respectively. W100303: The concentration of Mn2+


98.0 98.3





101 99.5





104 96.7





98.8 98.5


and Cd2+ , Cu2+


and Cd2+


RSD (%) —


3.9 2.4





2.8 1.6





3.3 1.9





3.5 2.3


were lower than 200, 50, 50 and , Zn2+


Fe3+ was 10 ng mL-1 samples and their analytical results were provided by Xi´an Hydrographic Bureau, Xi´an, Shaanxi Province, China. AMERICAN LABORATORY 30 MAY 2016 , and Pb2+


were lower , Cu2+


, Zn2+


in the water sample, respectively. W100304: The concentration of Mn2+ were lower than 200, 50 and 30 ng mL-1


, Cu2+ and in the water sample, respectively. All the water


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60