This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
REPORTS A B


Figure 4. Seed germination test after non-destructive tissue sampling for DNA extraction. (A) Image of tissue-sampled seeds after germination in a “ragdoll.” (B) Image of seedlings from sampled seeds grown in soil cups; cotyledons lack areas of marginal tissue due to previous sampling from the seed before germination.


plate reader (BMG LABTECH GMBH, Cary, NC). The plate reader data were imported into KlusterCaller software (LGC Genomics) for genotyping. In the event that greater ampli- fication was required, plates were returned to the Hydrocycler (LGC Genomics) for itera- tions of three additional PCR cycles, with the denaturation steps at 94°C for 20 s followed by annealing at 57°C for 1 min.


SNP amplification from cotton seed DNA The protocols above for non-destructive extraction of DNA from cotton seeds and SNP genotyping were tested with experi- mental research materials. DNA samples extracted in the prescribed manner from 88 first-generation backcross (BC1F1) cotton seeds were placed into the first 11 columns of a 96-well plate, where these 88 seeds were known on the basis of pedigree to be segregating for SNP Gl_072641. This is an alien chromosome segment derived from the species Gossypium longicalyx, a wild African relative of cultivated cotton. Column 12 of the same 96-well plate was dedicated to conventionally extracted DNA from the parental leaf tissue, using Qiagen DNeasy Plant Mini kits (#69106; Qiagen, Valencia, CA), and two non-template controls. All samples in the plate were amplified using the primer set for SNP Gl_072641.


SNP amplification for cotton cotyledon DNA The protocols above for non-destructive extraction of DNA from cotton seedling


Vol. 58 | No. 5 | 2015


cotyledons and SNP genotyping were tested with experimental research materials. Using the procedures described above, DNA samples were extracted from 36 s-generation backcross (BC2F1) hybrid seedlings from a G. hirsutum*2/Gossypium barbadense plant known to be heterozygous for an alien segment and then amplified using the SNP Gb_010283 that is located in that segment. DNA was extracted from young leaves of the parents using Qiagen DNeasy Plant Mini kits. The test plate included 2 non-template control wells and 16 empty wells.


Germination of drilled seeds after PCR analysis Drilled seeds were stored in modified plates in cabinet drawers at room temperature in a conventional air-conditioned office (Figure 1C). Germination rates were assessed by placing seeds in ragdolls of germination paper that had been pre-soaked with tap water alone or tap water plus Banrot (#MK03; BWI) (0.5 mL/100 mL tap water). Ragdolls were incubated in the dark at 30°C for 48 h before assessment.


Results and discussion


KASP ratios from the BC1F1 cotton seed DNA samples fell into two well-defined clusters (Figure 2). The patterns and positions of the two clusters of seed-based SNPs were congruent with expectations for a segregating marker with two genotypes: one heterozygous, similar to the F1 hybrid


240


parent reference (symbolized as FADD) and one homozygous, similar to the recurrent parent reference (symbolized as AADD). Each seed-based data point fell along the same ray (angle) as the respective reference samples that had the same genotype. The observed ratio in this batch of 88 BC1F1 seeds was 44:44, which happened to adhere exactly to the conventionally expected test cross ratio (1:1). Relative to conventionally prepared DNA


from segregating plants, we noted that the clusters were significantly more dispersed along the ray (angle), which indicates overall fluorescence amplitude was somewhat variable. We typically observed similar levels of dispersion at right angles to the ray, indicating that SNP-specific fluorochrome ratios were similar for the non-destructive seed-based extractions and conventional leaf-based extractions. There would seem to be two likely explanations for the additional variation in overall SNP signal amplitude, one being increased variation in DNA concen- tration for seed-based extractions and the other being variation in compounds that interfere with the PCR process, such as phenolics. Three or six extra PCR cycles were typically needed for DNA samples extracted from seeds compared with those from conventional leaf-based extractions. DNA samples extracted from cotyledons


were run in duplicate wells, and KASP ratios from all of the seedling DNA samples fell into two well-defined clusters (Figure 3). The patterns and positions of the clusters of seed- based SNPs were congruent with expecta-


www.BioTechniques.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68