This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Trans RINA, Vol 156, Part B2, Intl J Small Craft Tech, Jul-Dec 2014


eventually of energy. In this case it is necessary to accurately control the scaling of the emissions, ensuring the similarity of the mixing conditions of the released exhausts. Dimensional analysis of the parameters which mainly affect the behaviour of the exhausts discharged from a stack requires the conservation of a series of dimensionless parameters involving both the properties of the emission and those of the flow itself. In particular, the complete scaling is based on the following equation:


CU L2 ref ref QUf


  


 


s,, 2 a ref U


W gL ref


where W is the outlet speed of the gas released from the model, ρa and ρs represent, respectively, the density of the ambient air and of the emission, C is the volume


concentration and Q is the volumetric flow‐rate of the contaminant emitted by the source, at standard conditions of temperature and


pressure. The above equation


expresses the dimensionless concentration field as a function of three dimensionless parameters that relate the physical properties of the emission with those of the flow field in which it is dispersed. This implies that in order to have a perfect similarity between the full scale and the


lab‐scale model the following parameters should be kept constant: 


Speed ratio: W Uref


  Density ratio:


   


Froude Number: 2


s a


Fr U gL


 2


ref ref


The Froude number which can be also expressed as: 22


Fr UL gL


2    3


represents the ratio between the inertia and gravity forces in the considered flow. This type of scaling (complete scaling) cannot be easily obtained due to speed or temperature conditions required in the wind tunnel for


the small‐scale model. For this reason, the complete scaling, is often not used.


In order to be able to simulate a real scenario with a good representation of the main physical aspect of the problem, in a way that is consistent


with the


requirements of the complete scaling, some restrictions must be eliminated using what are called "enhanced scaling relationships".


This is how it is possible to combine different process variables in several dimensionless parameters which are


 


ref


not necessarily a complete set of parameters allowing for the definition of new scaling rules.


A parameter which is not essential is the ratio of density between the gas emitted and the surrounding air, α. It is not important by itself but it can affect the momentum of the emission and its buoyancy. The non-conservation of α results in several possible scaling rules, based on the consideration that the trajectory of the plume that is transported from the local wind is mainly determined by the ratio between the inertial and buoyancy forces. Therefore, this can lead to the following approximated equation:


CU L2  sW sa gL


ref ref   f


Q UUa ref


  


  


2 () 22,


 ref ref


in which ρref is a reference density which can be that of air, or that of the gas emitted.


In the wind tunnel experiments the choice is to follow a conservative approach by performing a scaling of the ratio between the emission and wind momentum, so as to reproduce consistently the interaction and the dilution/mixing conditions between flue gas and the external flow field, without obtaining a complete scaling of the buoyancy contribution. In practice, the density of the emission, which in the real case is less than that of air (given the high temperature of the flue gas), in the experiments is considered substantially equal to that of the air. This leads to a negative buoyancy of the plume, with the aim to better highlight the potential entrainment of the exhausts in areas of interest of the model. In fact the effect of a higher temperature of the fumes at full scale would


be to facilitate the dispersion in the


atmosphere of the fumes themselves, thereby reducing the chances of having re-ingestion phenomena or of discomfort in the areas of relevance of the vessel and its superstructure. Accordingly, the scaling of the gas discharge conditions is carried out as follows:





   


WW UU m


stack m stack


00  


()


where W0 is the exhaust speed at the stack tip, Ustack the wind speed at the actual stack height above the sea surface and α the density ratio. The subscript m indicates the parameters related to the small‐scale model.


During the wind tunnel tests tracer gas dispersion measurements are then performed using wind speed scaled accordingly to Froude number similarity law (i.e. maintaining the ratio between the inertia forces and the weight force).


ref


B-76


© 2014: The Royal Institution of Naval Architects


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88