This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Shop Solutions


It was last November when TEM decided to go after titanium aerospace jobs. Their fi rst job involved removing 80 lb (36 kg) of stock from a 200-lb (90.7-kg) fuel tank mounting bracket made of forged TI6Al4V. Besides skinning off about 1" (25.4 mm) of


ERI AMERICA-05-14ME.pdf 1 4/13/2014 4:39:56 PM


Fine Boring is Now Exciting! Introducing the EcoLine Fine Boring System by Swiss Tools (Ø1.57 - 3.94” on an ER25 Taper)


DESCRIPTION ECO HEAD SET BRIDGE ONLY


BORING RANGE


ø1.57 - 2.75" (39.9 - 70.1mm) ø2.76 - 3.94" (69.9 - 100.1mm)


FEATURES


• ER25 connection does not require special masters or extensions by utilizing standard ER25 Collet Chucks . • Vernier Scales for rough adjustment. • Fine Adjust Dial (ø0.01mm/0.0004” DIV).


• Chuck cone grip and face contact, allow for impressive rotational accuracy, maximum rigidity, and substantial retention force.


M Y Y Y ERI AMERICA TOOLHOLDING SOLUTIONS


STANDARD PRICE


$1,800 $285


INTRO. PRICE


$1,440 $228


stock, specs require hogging out several pockets measuring 4" deep by 8" wide by 11" long (100.6 × 203 x 279 mm). TEM was already thinking high-feed practices at the time, but wanted to be sure they were using the latest and best. So at the bid stage, TEM considered the possibilities with Ingersoll’s David Gradie because of the company’s deep knowledge base in high-feed machining. In high-feed milling, stock is removed in shallower, faster passes, which enables higher metal removal rates (MRR) with lower cutting forces. This helps run ma- terial fast on 40-taper machines without stalling the spindle.


EcoLine head & CV40-ER25-160


EcoLine head with optional bridge & CV40-ER25-65


EcoLine head & optional bridge


www.eri-america • info@eri-america.com 877-374-8005


58 ManufacturingEngineeringMedia.com | May 2014


Gradie estimated that the new In- gersoll Hi-Quad-F cutter with new insert grade IN4030 could rough the parts in less than 15 hours, with a set of inserts lasting through an entire piece. Most important, the removal rate was about double what conventional milling cutters could deliver on a 40-taper machine. TEM had ballparked the job using conventional tooling, and came up with about 25 hours per part. Maximum pos- sible parameters for a 40-taper machine were 125 sfm (38 m/min), 6.6 ipm (167 mm/min), 0.100" (2.5 mm) DOC. “Had we run a conventional tool any faster on our equipment, either the inserts would rupture or the spindle would overload,” TEM said. So the high-feed approach defi nitely seemed the way to go. TEM got the job, with initial runs on the new tool coming out better than pre- dicted. Parameters were 125 sfm (38 m/min), 0.040" (1 mm) DOC, 30 ipm (0.76 m/min), yielding a cycle time of about 12 hours, with a single set of in- serts lasting all the way through. These are roughly the numbers on which TEM started machining.


Next, TEM started to push the enve- lope, ramping up the parameters, and found that with the new IN4030 coating,


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150