This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
NEWS Dutch court says linking is not a copyright breach


said otherwise. In that case, a court in Te Hague found that the embedding of radio streams on two websites, one of which was nederland.fm, constituted copyright infringement.


Te rulings have been part of a big discussion on whether linking is infringing, said Bjorn Schipper, a lawyer at Bousie Advocaten in Amsterdam, but the latest decision confirms the “accepted” rule.


“We now have at least two decisions that say linking is not an intervention and therefore not an infringement,” he said.


A Dutch appeals court has ruled that providing hyperlinks to infringing copyrighted material does not count as a breach of IP.


Te Amsterdam Court of Appeal cleared website GeenStijl.nl of


infringing Playboy’s copyright


when it linked to leaked nude pictures due to be published by the adult magazine.


GeenStijl.nl, a blogging site, had published an article in October 2011 about pictures of Dutch TV presenter Britt Dekker that were set to be released by Playboy two months later.


Te article contained a link to a zip file with the pictures, hosted on file-sharing site filefactory.


com, before being updated with a link to ImageShack, a site that hosts photos. Two more articles with links were later published. Aſter Playboy sued for copyright infringement, a lower Amsterdam court said the hyperlinks were a new publication—and therefore infringed Playboy’s rights.


But that decision was overturned by the city’s Court of Appeal on November 19, though the court said GeenStijl.nl had unlawfully published Playboy’s photos, ordering it to pay damages.


Te ruling is the second in the Netherlands to confirm that linking to infringement is not a copyright breach itself, while a third decision


“I am happy with the outcome of this decision. Te Amsterdam court stipulates the general rule.”


Schipper added: “Te ruling applies only to this case, but because it is an appeals court and they have made some general considerations, a lot of parties could use this decision in their cases about whether hyperlinking is an infringement.”


“Te discussion will be ongoing,” Schipper said.


Tere are at least two cases in which the CJEU has been asked to rule on whether linking to infringing material is a copyright breach. Te cases, both referred from Sweden, are expected to be decided next year. 


GLOBAL EXPERIENCE IN BRAND MANAGEMENT


Squire Sanders can help you protect one of your most valuable assets – your brand. We provide the complete range of legal services across the lifecycle of a trade mark including clearance searches, filing and prosecution, oppositions and revocations and portfolio management. We devise effective anti-counterfeiting strategies and advise on cost-effective dispute resolution. Beyond protection, we help to realise the value of a brand through commercial agreements.


We represent companies, of all sizes and in all fields, throughout the world, and help them to protect and exploit their brands.


Best of all, our team combines a seamless international service with a local presence – meaning we can solve your branding issues wherever they arise in the world and wherever you are based.


Contact:


Chris McLeod +44 20 7655 1590


chris.mcleod@squiresanders.com


Florian Traub +44 20 7655 1091


florian.traub@squiresanders.com


squiresanders.com www.worldipreview.com Trademarks Brands and the Internet Volume 2, Issue 4 9


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44