NEWS Lush brings trademark lawsuit against Amazon
Cosmetics company Lush has brought a lawsuit against online retailer Amazon claiming it is infringing its trademark, TB&I has learned.
Suing under the name Cosmetic Warriors LTD, Lush has said that Amazon’s search engine has been generating results for the term ‘Lush’ despite its not selling any Lush products.
Lush has also claimed that, through the use of Google AdWords, a person searching for “Lush Bath Products” would be redirected to the Amazon website where they would be shown alternative products.
Court documents seen by TB&I say “… a number of products were returned which were similar to L’s [Lush], but were not L’s at all.”
T e case has similarities with the Interfl ora v Marks & Spencer High Court ruling in May this year.
T ere, Mr Justice Arnold found that retailer Marks & Spencer’s use of ‘Interfl ora’ Google AdWords that produced search results for its fl ower delivery services did infringe trademarks belonging to an existing fl ower delivery company of the same name.
Making reference to the Interfl ora decision, Chris McLeod, fi rst vice president of
the Institute of
Trade Mark Attorneys and director of trademarks at Squire Sanders LLP, said it would boil down to consumer knowledge.
“If you are looking for a particular brand and competing products come up, either the person making that happen is infringing or you say consumers are canny and intelligent enough to
know it is not the same thing and therefore not infringement,” he said.
“When performi ng the search you can see the products really do look like what Lush would sell and there are several uses of the word. But, that said, they are clearly not Lush products.”
Originally set up in 1994, Lush now operates more than 800 stores in 51 countries. It produces and sells handmade cosmetic products, including soaps, shower gels and shampoos.
Last week, in a pre-trial hearing, it fi led permission to introduce a passing off claim into the lawsuit and bring in the results of a survey in order to identify customer confusion.
Lush claimed it had already carried out two “expert designed” pilot surveys.
T e addition of a passing off claim was accepted but the survey was rejected due to having “no real value” to a trial judge putting himself in the position of a consumer.
“I would agree with that,” said McLeod. “It has always been problematic to use surveys to prove a point because it’s very diffi cult to create questions that aren’t going to lead the respondent into making an answer whether they wanted to or not.
“T ere’s a long-running trend whereby the courts have hammered survey evidence. It is now fairly straightforward for a judge to put themselves in the position of an average consumer.”
T e case is expected to go to trial before the end of the year. Lush and Amazon both declined to comment.
6
Trademarks Brands and the Internet Volume 2, Issue 3
www.worldipreview.com
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44