This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
THREE-SPHERE FORM OF GOVERNMENT


The lobby of the Old National Assembly


with a Bill or will abstain from voting on the Bill. No further negotiations are allowed. A report is then prepared for consideration by the House. This represents the voting stage which is the last in the process when a province either votes in favour of or against a Bill or abstains from voting on the Bill. The vote is cast by the head of the delegation. Once passed, a Bill introduced in


the NCOP is transmitted to the NA for consideration and decision. If the NA passes the Bill without amendment, it is submitted to the President for signature and assent. If the NA amends it, the Bill must be referred back to the NCOP for reconsideration and decision. If the NCOP passes a Bill without amendment, likewise, it must be submitted to the President for signature and assent. Just as a Bill passed by the NA


must be transmitted to the NCOP for consideration and decision, if the NCOP amends the Bill, it must be referred back to the NA for reconsideration and decision. When the NA passes it, the Bill must be referred to the President for signature and assent.


may either be introduced in the NA or the NCOP. A Bill introduced in the NA must be dealt with in terms of the procedure prescribed in section 76(1) and the Bill introduced in the NCOP must be dealt with in terms of section 76(2) of the constitution.


Provinces take their positions At the start of the process, provincial Legislatures confer with their delegations on a Bill. At this stage, depending on whether there are different provincial views, delegates


from different provinces attempt to convince one another to accept each other’s position on the Bill. Once a committee has deliberated


on different provincial positions and has decided which position(s) to accept or reject, delegates report back to their provincial Legislatures on the position adopted by the committee with a view to obtaining a final position of the province on a Bill. This is referred to as a final mandate. At this stage, a province states whether it agrees or disagrees


Disagreements between the national Houses Disagreement may ensue if the NCOP is of the view that a Bill does not fully take provincial interests into consideration. If, after reconsideration, the Houses still disagree, a Bill is referred to the Mediation Committee, which is formed as and when required to break a deadlock between the Houses. It consists of nine Members from the NA and nine permanent delegates from the NCOP, representing each province. The Mediation Committee may


either agree on a Bill as passed by the NA or an amended Bill as passed by the NCOP or another version of the Bill. The Mediation Committee must exercise any of these options within 30 days, failing which a Bill lapses if it was introduced in the NCOP. If it was introduced in the NA, it may still be passed by the NA if it gets a two- thirds majority.


If the Mediation Committee


agrees on the Bill as passed by the NA, the Bill must be referred to the NCOP, and if the latter passes the Bill, it must be referred to the President for signature and assent. The converse is true if the Mediation Committee agrees on the Bill as passed by the NCOP. If the Mediation Committee agrees on another version, the Bill must be referred to both Houses and, if passed, it must be referred to the President for assent.


Bills not affecting provinces These are Bills dealing with functional areas on which only the national government may legislate, such as defence, intelligence, et cetera. These Bills may only be introduced in the NA. Unlike Bills affecting provinces, the NCOP may only propose amendments which the NA may either accept or reject. For it to be passed, a Bill must be supported by at least the majority of delegates present. Because these Bills do not affect the provinces, delegates need not confer with the authority to decide on the vote by their Provincial Legislatures.


Speaking for the provinces It is clear that the NCOP has greater influence in the law-making process on matters affecting the provinces, enabling it to effectively represent the interests of the provinces in the national legislative process. The fact that decisions on Bills affecting the provinces are subjected to mediation in the event of disagreement between the NCOP and the NA emphasizes this point. The NA may still pass a Bill


affecting provinces after mediation has failed; but this has never happened in the history of our Parliament. One may venture to suggest that it may be that such a law may not enjoy legitimacy because it would have effectively been rejected by the provinces which may be required to administer it. Rather than proceeding with such a Bill, the best option would be to allow it to lapse. Here lies the power of the NCOP to represent the interests of provinces.


The Parliamentarian | 2013: Issue One - South Africa | 67


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196  |  Page 197  |  Page 198  |  Page 199