This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Giving Evidence in Court


have arrived at differing conclusions, either clinically or in terms of expression of the relevance of any clinical findings to the legal questions at hand.


Te provision of a good written report should mean that the process of giving oral evidence is far less challenging an experience than otherwise would have been the case.


During the preparation of a written report the expert is likely to have read and drawn upon a large amount of written material. Including a summary of the relevant parts of this in the written report (see Chapter 8) will obviate the need laboriously to go through the material again.


Te contemporaneous handwritten notes from the interviews conducted with the subject to produce the report need to be kept securely, and then brought to court on the day of the hearing in case any party wishes to read and/or to question the doctor about this material.


A key to feeling confident at court is having a sound knowledge, both of the nature of the interface between law and psychiatry in general, and of the case itself, including your own report and the reports of others. Experts are almost always permitted to refer to their report and to their notes whilst giving evidence. Markup your report, and the reports of other experts, so that you can quickly find important passages, and recall what else you may wish to emphasise. In complex cases it may assist to make your own evidential notes, maybe in the form of a ‘mind map’; not only can this help you piece together the connections between the different items of evidence you have used, or disregarded, it can also help in thinking through how best to explain your conclusions and, importantly, what those who do not agree with you are likely to see as the weak points in your opinion.


Often, especially in complex cases, it is helpful to both lawyer and doctor to meet before the hearing in order to go through the evidence to be given. Tis gives the doctor the opportunity to highlight to the lawyer aspects of their evidence that they believe are especially important, and for them both to anticipate challenges to the doctor’s opinion. Most likely the lawyer concerned will have little knowledge of psychiatry, certainly less than the expert witness, and without guidance they may misunderstand a part of a report or not foresee what to the expert might be an obvious challenge. A good barrister will anticipate cross examination points and rehearse them with the doctor in conference.


Perhaps unfairly, it is important for an expert entering a courtroom to give a good first impression. Dress formally – ‘one stage more formally than you would to work’ is a helpful rule of thumb. Conservative clothes are to be preferred.


Process General advice


• Speak slowly and clearly; if you speak too fast you will probably confuse yourself, use too many words, and so open up more avenues for challenge, and in any event you will be asked to slow


down


• As far as possible, simplify your opinion, especially in front of a jury • Use concrete metaphors in order to get over abstract concepts


71


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156