This book includes a plain text version that is designed for high accessibility. To use this version please follow this link.
“Our main aim is


to reduce or eliminate anthropogenic


emissions and releases of mercury.”


UNINTENDED EMISSIONS


– In relation to the use of mercury in some compact fluores- cent lamps, at this stage, no affordable and available alterna- tive is currently available at the global level. Nonetheless, we need to be working to phase these out and push the market towards alternatives. In the interim, it should also be noted that, where power is generated by coal combustion, the provision of energy efficient lighting can result in significant reductions in the emissions of mercury through decreased power consumption, which may (even with mercury-contain- ing fluorescent lamps) result in a lower net mercury release or emission to the environment. The effects on the environment of mercury-containing products such as these lamps can also be minimized by the implementation of environmentally sound management of mercury-containing waste. Waste separation programmes and recycling activities are able to reduce the mercury made available to the environment from such products.


– VCM using the mercury process is another where there is no commercially viable alternative at this point in time. The demand for polyvinyl chloride is very high in some countries, particularly where there are extensive building projects, and in some countries the viable sources of raw materials for VCM mean that mercury use is needed. Nonetheless, measures to minimize emissions and releases should be applied immedi- ately, as well as a plan for eventual phasing out as alternatives are found. It is my expectation that, over time, all of these uses will become increasingly limited, and eventually will cease.


MERCURY – TIME TO ACT 7


About half of the global anthropogenic mercury emis- sions come from the burning of coal, metals production and the production of cement. What concrete mechanisms exist to address this?


– The control of mercury emissions from major sources has been one of the key areas of discussion in the intergovern- mental negotiations. Various mechanisms and approaches to reduce mercury emissions have been discussed and discus- sions continue on a variety of measures including the use of best available techniques and best environmental practices, the use of emission limit values, the establishment of national goals and the use of national implementation plans to set out action plans for managing emissions. It should also be recog- nized that many countries already have controls in place to reduce mercury emissions – either as stand-alone controls, or as part of a multipollutant strategy.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44