This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
CIBSE BUILDING PEFORMANCE AWARDS 2013 SHORTLIST


Susie Diamond, John Field and Graham Manly weigh up the entries


The category for New Build Project of the


Year (value up to £5m) was ‘keenly contested’, and judges were impressed by the level of data from some of the entries, as well as by the application of sound engineering principles to help deliver very good buildings. The judges feared the Building Operation


Award would attract entries full of corporate marketing gloss, but were pleasantly surprised. ‘They were all good entries,’ said Kevin Kelly, president elect SLL and head of electrical services engineering, Dublin Institute of Technology. ‘There were no weak ones.’ The Training for Building Performance


David Vincent and Paddy Conaghan


Award attracted entrants from a wide range of fi rms – from large developers with extensive training plans to small consultants with simple but brilliant methods of disseminating information. The fi nal shortlist represents the diversity of the entrants. The judges spoke highly of the shortlisted entrants in the Contractor of the Year category. ‘These are very good examples of quality contractors,’ said Graham Manly, business development director, Gratte Brothers. ‘Industry would recognise these companies as good fi rms.’ This was another very closely contested category that stimulated a lively discussion among the judges. In the product categories there was a


Foroutan Parand and Jeff House


good range of entrants covering products that use energy as well as the passive category featuring innovative products that reduce energy use in buildings. The judges said they ‘enjoyed’ reading the entries and said they hoped more manufacturers would be encouraged to enter next year to show off the capacity for innovation in the industry. The Client Energy Management Award was


another close run contest. The judges were pleased to see it had attracted entries from organisations taking a long-term approach to reducing energy use and cutting energy emissions. ‘We felt there were some good examples of what clients can do to improve energy effi ciency in buildings,’ said Davies. Shortlisting for the Refurbishment


Project Award was more clear cut, with everyone agreeing on the best schemes. The judges thought the category important. ‘Refurbishment is always diffi cult and we need to promote examples of good practice,’ said Foroutan Parand, URS, head of building physics, URS Infrastructures and Environment UK. The winners of the awards will be revealed


by TV personality and former Conservative MP Gyles Brandreth at the Grosvenor House Hotel on 5 February 2013. CJ


www.cibsejournal.com


Scan the code above to link straight to the awards website


The judges feared the Building Operation Award would attract entries full of corporate marketing gloss, but they were pleasantly surprised


THE JUDGES


Paddy Conaghan, consultant, Hoare Lea


Hywel Davies, technical director, CIBSE (chair of judges)


Susie Diamond, founding partner, Inkling


John Field, energy services director, TEAM (Energy Auditing Agency Ltd)


Jeff House, marketing & applications manager, Baxi Commercial Division


Kevin Kelly, president elect SLL and head electrical services engineering, Dublin Institute of Technology


Graham Manly OBE, business development director, Gratte Brothers


Foroutan Parand, head of building physics, URS Infrastructures and Environment UK Ltd


David Vincent, director, David Vincent & Associates


December 2012 CIBSE Journal


13


ALL IMAGES PROVIDED BY AKIN FALOPE


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68