This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
ETHICS


what evidence would be required. This could also lead to more novel ways of funding research, which would come from joint research funding brought about by the NHS and industry working more closely together. This could take the form of limited marketing authorisation being granted to industry at specified NHS trial centres that would then pay to use the product, while helping to produce the required evidence. Mr Goldberg explained his


Mr Andrew Goldberg.


idea in more depth: “If 15 years worth of evidence, for example, is required to produce meaningful data for a hip replacement product, 10 NHS centres could be chosen to run a trial. Limited marketing authorisation would then be given to the product manufacturer to allow it to sell the product to the chosen centres. It is far more cost-effective for the company to be able to sell 10,000 products to 10 centres, than to sell 10,000 products to 200 centres, which is what happens today. Aside from bringing down the cost of sales, this would enable a rich source of meaningful data to be collected and would also ensure that patients were not being exposed to thousands of clinicians’ learning curves.”


‘Mr Goldberg proposed an interesting potential new way forward which could benefit all the stakeholders involved in the process ofbringing a new product to market.’


Mr Goldberg argued his case further. “This process aligns agendas – the company is not the sole funder of the product trial – because the NHS, in purchasing the product, is co-investing in the testing phase.” He continued: “This also produces more incentive for industry to run the most appropriate trials to demonstrate that the product has a legacy and, at an agreed point, the project would move into the post-market surveillance phase and appropriate measures could be put in place so that longer-term complications or issues could be identified and addressed.” The Joint Registries that exist in the UK already put us at the forefront of an information revolution in


medicine, but there are many thousands of implants that are not currently subject to such rigorous audit and in many cases, we do not want to compare just technology against technology but rather more technology against a non-invasive or non-operative alternative. Mr Goldberg did admit


that introducing such a radically different approach to product introduction would be a complex thing


to initiate. “If handed to civil servants, it would fail miserably,” he said. “It would need to be tackled at a senior political level to turn it into reality.” Finally, Mr Goldberg concluded his


presentation by pointing out that most innovation in the NHS is not actually related to the use of new technology, but is more often about services. “Most innovation in the NHS comes about as a result of changing the way that things are done,” he said. “I believe that we could make a far greater contribution to improvements in patient care by focusing on process change, rather than thinking up more and more ‘innovative’ devices.”





Reduction in budgets need not lead to a reduction of your demands.


Quality, Function and Design of the highest standard combined with the latest technology for more than 80 years.


MARCH 2012


THE CLINICAL SERVICES JOURNAL


27


See us at the BSCCP, 40th Anniversary Meeting 18th – 20th April 2012 Gateshead/ Newcastle


Our specialist for all gynaecology solutions: VISION MEDICAL Ltd. TEL: 0208 398 3417 or 07595 882667 MAIL: info@visionmedical.co.uk NET: www.visionmedical.co.uk /www.schmitz-soehne.com


Our specialist for OR-tables, patient trolleys and medical furniture: RYNA MEDICAL UK Ltd. TEL: 01454 801560 or 07817 753098 MAIL: info@rynamedical.co.uk NET: www.rynamedical.co.uk /www.schmitz-soehne.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60