This book includes a plain text version that is designed for high accessibility. To use this version please follow this link.
Here’s how to earn your CEU hour. Test Time CERTIFICATION MADE POSSIBLE


Once you finish reading these two CMP Series articles, read “A Strategic Perspective for Meetings Management,” a chapter from Professional Meeting Management, Fifth Edition (PMM5), available at the CMP Series link below.


 To earn one hour of CEU credit, visitwww.pcma.org/convenecmp to answer questions about the information contained within these two CMP Series articles and the PMM5 chapter.


The Certified Meeting Professional (CMP) is a registered trademark of the Convention Industry Council.


mature programs indicated that not having it measured to begin with could be a distraction to progress. They advised that planners make some assumptions based on the data they know and project fromthere. Hard data earns respectwithin an organization and facil-


itates a change in the team’s role.With data, you can have a different conversation with management, especially during budget season. Tamer suggested partnering with the HR department to come up with a report that shows how many training events each employee attended over the course of the year — which would help indicate how much money the company is investing in training. Another option is to hire a consultant who specializes in


mining through company data in order to help analyze it. While the industry has not yet developed benchmarks, it was suggested that planners could benchmark their program’s performance against that of their peers who work for simi- lar organizations.


Meetings Procurement Cards for Payment The group reported having a variety of experiences in using payment cards (P-Cards) for meetings, such as:  For some, this is a great way to help track meetings spend, allowing them to segment expenditures by internal general ledger codes or generic categories.  Others have trouble with compliance and, as a result, with streamlining the payment process. They reported that they now are managing two processes—compliant and non-compliant payments.  Several participants stressed the importance of making P-Cards part of the travel and meetings policy—and to have executive-level support on this initiative. One person


“It is important to use sharp facilitation skills [for consensus] and remain open for stakeholder input and feedback. Mandates do not work.”


64 pcma convene January 2011


reported that an offender at her company is an executive who likes to build up points for personal travel use, which some in the group found to be unethical.  The challenge with using P-Cards is in controlling which expenses are used for general T&E expenses versus key meeting expenses. Suggestions included developing a pol- icy on the use of P-Cards for consistent utilization, and working with P-Card providers to help provide more effi- cient reconciliation capabilities and obtain a comprehen- sive understanding of true meeting spend.


Meetings Technology Many participants commented on the importance of technology resources to generate greater efficiencies. More participants this year seemed prepared to make an investment in technology than at theNBTAbreakfasts the year before. Corporate procurement staff seem to be early adopters and are pushing the demand. One table discussed the misperception that technology


enables an organization to operatewith fewer staff. Technology is an enabler, making the process easier, but it still takes smart people to use sound event-management processes and strategy. Another participant acknowledged that his plans call for an


outsourced third party to manage the technology for his orga- nization’s benefit to ensure budget and policy compliance. Some participants expressed that itwould be helpful if more


event-budget calculatorswere provided as part of the technol- ogy solution, to help less-experienced stakeholders have a bet- ter comprehension of meetings budgeting. Post-event, actual costs against budget are proving to be a challenge and can be a result of the multiple reimbursement processes in usewithin many corporations. One participant said that she has been successful in making


the case for technology by proving that her company had organized a series of meetings in the same hotel over the course of a fewweeks—and none of the planners knewthat other parts of her companywere there at the same time. After analyz- ing the contracts, itwas found that each had gotten very differ- ent rates and concessions, and all had incurred attrition penalties. The casewas made that a technology tool could make it clearwhat meetingswere being planned company- wide, so that her company could benefit frommaking a bulk buy and reduce its risk. 


www.pcma.org


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108