vision So those sorts of people need dedicated
networks of their own, in which they can tailor the coverage to make sure that it meets their needs. Te public operators never will do that. Similarly, they don’t provide the levels of resilience that our types of users have come to expect – as a result of which, you’ll find cellular networks that go down to four, five, ten hours at a time. Which might be embarrassing for them, but it’s totally unacceptable if you are providing critical communications.
Moving ahead So it’s about extending the lifetime of the TETRA ecosystem by taking it in broadband direction? We are trying to make sure that we encourage the development of standards that will be compatible with current TETRA networks but will meet the requirements going forward. We will therefore try to make sure that the TETRA Association is constructed in a manner that will enable us to go forward and meet those needs.
Demand for broadband Will the association take an active role in creating and specifying those standards? Yes and no. Te TETRA Association doesn’t create standards. We leave that to the professional standards bodies such as ETSI, 3GPP and the rest. But what we are doing is stimulating within those standards bodies the creation of standards, or the modification of existing standards, that will provide solutions for our types of users. And in TC TETRA, which is the ETSI working group, we have stimulated a project which is looking at providing mobile broadband solutions. We are pushing them very hard, because the demand has mushroomed in the last year or two. Almost certainly it’s because of things like the iPad. People are saying, ‘If I’ve got an iPad in my ambulance, I could be getting all sorts of information on the patient’. Tey’re saying, ‘I can see the advantages of this, but I need to have connectivity that is absolutely 100 per cent reliable and absolutely 100 per cent available – and I can’t necessarily get that from public networks’.
Top priority But everywhere you look, people seem to be saying there isn’t enough spectrum to have any more broadband unless you go on the public networks.
Tat is something that we’ve been working on within the TETRA Association in conjunction with Public Safety Communications Europe, where we have been jointly lobbying the European Commission very hard to try and find harmonized spectrum across Europe.
Issue 5 2011 TE TRA TODAY ‘
One of the critical things in the coming years is going to be educating the people who make decisions as to why public networks cannot do the job
We need to find solutions not just for public safety and not just for Europe, but that is a very significant start. We’ve been lobbying very hard for the last couple of years in conjunction with some of the user groups and we are starting to have some effect. Te latest version of the Commission’s radio spectrum policy programme now includes a requirement to provide spectrum for PPDR [public protection and disaster relief] use. Tat is a major step forward. However, spectrum is still allocated on a national basis and therefore we still have a lot of work to do to lobby the individual regulators in individual countries. Spectrum is absolutely top of our priority list at the moment.
A lengthy process What’s your feeling about how long it might take to get a result? Terein lies the problem. Gaining harmonized spectrum is a very long process. It took a long time when we did it the first time round with TETRA. And because you had to get decisions that are made through the WARC process [ITU World Administrative Radio Conference], even to get a decision is going to take you four or five years. And then, assuming they make a favourable decision, it takes four or five years to get that spectrum cleared and made available. So you’re talking about 10 years plus in
order to get the spectrum that we need. But if you don’t start working on it now, it will not appear when it’s needed in the future. It’s not soon enough. But one of the reasons
that TETRA is such a worldwide success is because we succeeded in creating a highly competitive market – and that was created because we had a common technology in harmonized spectrum. So if we’re going to provide viable solutions in the future, we really need to
‘
have harmonized solutions and harmonized technologies. Tat is our ambition: to try to create a technology that will provide broadband services on a worldwide basis in a harmonized manner. It may be an ambitious target, but it is our target to try to create a single technology worldwide.
’ Why change?
Changing the name of the association and putting Critical Communications into it: what does that let you do that you couldn’t have done anyway? It’s not so much what it lets us do – I think that it’s simply reflects more accurately what we already are doing and what our ambitions are. We want to make sure that the association
remains an up-to-date and relevant association for users of critical communications – and TETRA is one very important plank in that. But there are other things that we feel we should be addressing. Tere are perhaps other user communities
that aren’t currently using TETRA but may also be looking for harmonized solutions for critical broadband – people like the Tetrapol users and users of other technologies. We would like to be able to meet their needs as well. One of the critical things in the coming
years is going to be educating the people who make decisions as to why public networks cannot do the job. If you are running a police force and somebody says, ‘We want to build out a dedicated network and it’s going to cost this many hundreds of millions of pounds to do so’, the first thing they will say is: ‘But my daughter can do all this sort of stuff you’re talking about on her smartphone, and she does it for £25 per month. So why do you need to build your own dedicated network?’ It is not going to be an easy task to really get these people to understand the limitations of public networks.
You’re talking about 10 years plus in order to get the spectrum that we need. But if you don’t start working on it now, it will not appear when it’s needed in the future
’ 15
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40