Industrials
Nordic 260 response rate: Industrials Overall: 65% (35 of 54)
Key Industries within the sector: Machinery (12 of 18); Construction & Engineering (8 of 11); Commercial Services & Supplies (5 of 8)
Responders ÅF Group, Assa Abloy, Atlas Copco, Cardo (SA), Cargotec, FLSmidth & Co., G4S, Gunnebo, JM, Kone, Konecranes, Kongsberg Gruppen, Lassila & Tikanoja, Lemminkainen Group, Lindab, Metso, NCC, NKT Holding, Orkla, Outotec, Peab, Rockwool International, SAAB, Sandvik, Scania, Securitas, Skanska, SKF, Solar, Tomra Systems, Trelleborg, Uponor, Veidekke, Vestas Wind Systems, Volvo, Wärtsilä Corporation
Largest non-respondents include: Alfa Laval Corporate, Hexagon, Subsea 717
Opportunities reported • Increased demand for energy-, fuel- and water-efficient products.
• Competitive edge through tightening of emissions standards abroad.
• Increased demand for resilient products in the face of extreme weather, high and low temperatures, condensation, etc.
• Reputational benefits for firms offering energy-efficient products.
• Development of new services including carbon-footprinting.
Risks reported • Indirect exposure to carbon taxes and regulations through suppliers and clients; some direct exposure within own operations.
• Costs of adapting production and distribution to cope with extreme weather events and longer-term climate change.
• Reputational and business risks if firms fail to meet customers’ expectations on environmental performance.
Fig 27: Emissions disclosure (million metric tons CO2e)
(74% disclosed) Scope 3
(100% disclosed) Scope 2
(100% disclosed) Scope 1
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Key actions • Efficiency improvements, e.g. in insulation, heat recovery, and use of sustainable materials.
• Efficiency gains in production processes, e.g. through load balancing, use of timers and sensors, and reduced waste.
• Increased use of renewable energy and fuels, inc. in company vehicles.
• More efficient transport and distribution through route opti- misation, maximised loads, optimised packaging and favouring of rail.
Performance indicators Average disclosure score Verification rate Scope 1 Verification rate Scope 2
Share with emissions reduction targets Change in emissions during 2010
Nordic 260 64
47% 38% 67%
+0.9%
Industrials 64
34% 34% 71%
+12.6%
17. Subsea 7 cited the ongoing merger (with Acergy) during the responding period 2011 as the reason for not responding.
46 ‘In 2007, total calculated
CO2e emissions from new housing projects during their first two years of use was 4,047 tons. In 2010 the corresponding figure was 1,833 tons, indicating a 55% reduction
of CO2e emissions from our products in use.’ JM
‘Maximizing the “fill rate” of trucks that deliver SKF’s goods is critical from an economic and environmental perspective. In 2010, these efforts resulted in a fill rate of 77% compared to 72% in 2009 and this reduced the carbon emissions per tonne-kilometre by 12%.’
SKF
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62