This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
BLOOD MANAGEMENT


Experts from the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) explain more about its role in blood management.


F


rom a regulatory perspective, blood is treated in two ways:


1. When blood components (platelets, red cells etc) are used for transfusion it comes under the EU Blood Directive 2002/98/EC and its three associated directives. This was transposed into national legislation via the Blood Safety and Quality Regulations 2005 No. 50 and the Blood Safety and Qual- ity (Amendment) (No.2) Regulations 2005 No. 2898 became effective for the purposes of regulation in the United Kingdom (UK) on November 8, 2005. They apply to blood establishments, hospital blood banks and blood facilities.


2. When blood is ‘industrially’ processed (e.g. in the manufacture of plasma-derived o products such as albumin, clotting factors and immunoglobulins) it comes under med- icines legislation (Directive 2001/83/EC).


For both circumstances, MHRA is the Competent Authority in the UK.


When blood is used for transfusion purpos- es, the MHRA is responsible for: • Ensuring compliance with the EU Blood Directives, as transposed into UK legisla- tion. This assessment may be by site in- spection, or by remote assessment of com- pliance report submissions.


• Authorising Blood Establishments (or- ganisations who collect, process and per- form screening tests on blood donations).


• Operating the UK’s haemovigilance sys- tem (SABRE), which collates reports of serious adverse events and serious adverse reactions relating to blood transfusion.


The MHRA, along with its equivalent com- petent authorities from the other EU Mem- ber States, also has a role in representing the UK during drafting and amendment of European standards and technical texts as- sociated with the Blood Directives.


Trends in compliance


The UK Blood Services have been inspected since loss of Crown Immunity in 1992, and therefore have a number of years of expe- rience in implementing the principles of Good Practice. The UK Blood Safety and Quality Regulations extended these re- quirements to Hospital Blood Banks and Blood Facilities from November 2005.


Some of the Quality Management Systems elements of Good Practice (such as change control, validation and non-conformance investigation) were new to Hospital Blood Banks, and took some time to become in- tegrated within the operational procedures at these sites. The MHRA identified these problem areas during assessment of an- nual blood compliance report submissions, and ran a series of seminars across the UK during 2009 that focused on these issues in order to provide Good Practice training to blood bank staff. Inspection findings have subsequently noted a general improvement


In such cases, the detailed compliance concerns are reviewed by the MHRA’s In- spection Action Group (IAG), which makes recommendations for action based on risk to public health.


The IAG is a cross-agency group who follow a risk assessment process including consid- eration of risks arising from difficulties in obtaining blood for transfusion as a result of the regulatory action. Wherever possi- ble, MHRA works with the organisation in question to return to a state of compliance, rather than taking formal action to prevent some or all activities. This often involves a period of increased inspection surveillance. Referrals for consideration of regulatory action have been made in a limited num- ber of cases since the regulations came into force in November 2005.


Record keeping


The EU Blood Directives require that national health executive Sep/Oct 11 | 79


in compliance, as non-compliances gener- ally relate to weaknesses in elements of the quality system, rather than absence of these elements.


Enforcement action


Regulatory Action may be taken against blood establishments, hospital blood banks or blood facilities, in cases of serious non- compliance with the requirements of Good Practice or regulatory obligations.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104