This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
graffiti


Front, now sadly largely bricked up, is widely regarded as the earliest example of Gothic “Bar” tracery to be found anywhere in Britain. Built between 1226 and 1244, the West Front at Binham was a revolutionary architectural design. Documented by the St Alban’s chronicler, Matthew Paris, it was created decades before the techniques were generally adopted at sites such asWestminster Abbey. As a result, it has also become the centre of one of history’s greatest architectural mysteries – it appeared in a remote corner of Norfolk, decades before it was used elsewhere in the country. Further, the design changed part way through construction, making the mastermason’s original intentions even more tantalising. The initial visual survey at BinhamPriory was


highly encouraging, identifying a number of areas on the arcades where graffiti inscriptions were to be found. Unsurprisingly, being only a few miles inland and a likely stop-over point for medieval pilgrims travelling from the Glaven ports to nearby Walsingham, a number of ship inscriptions were present, although on a much reduced scale to those discovered Blakeney. The initial survey also noted a number of mason’s or merchant’smarks, a crude gaming board and a number of initials. However, the survey and recording process was hampered by the fact that several of the surfaces were covered in what appeared to be a large collection of random lines and curves. It was only when the surveyors abandoned the


graffiti survey techniques and reverted to the traditional measured survey that these lines and curves began to make sense. Graffiti inscriptions are most usually small scale undertakings and, when surveying an area of wall 30cm by 30cm, it is easy to identify smaller inscriptions. However, the larger scale inscriptions, of which you can see only a fragment, are difficult to comprehend. It soon became clear that this was the case at Binham. The lines and curves revealed themselves to be a deeply etched inscription that wasmore than eight feet (2.4 metres) tall and was inscribed using dividers, compasses and square edges to a consistent scale. It was also clear that the inscription was architectural in nature and, inscribed into


32 Cornerstone, Vol 32, No 2 2011


From top, the style of script in this inscription at All Saints suggests that it was created in the late 1400s; a swastika pelta cross, a motif with strong links to early Christianity which can be found on old buildings across the region; ‘daisy wheels’, another familiar pattern found on old buildings, have been linked to consecration cross locations


12th-century fabric but beneath the 14th-century paint scheme, it was medieval. The full survey of the wall soon revealed the


design to be fragments of a complex tracery pattern. Further examination confirmed that the tracery pattern in question actually related to the design of the West Front of the Priory. Inscribed tracery patterns such as the example uncovered at Binham have also been discovered in other cathedrals and


churches throughout Europe. Known as “épures”, these drawings often represent the architect’s working drawings. The most famous English example is to be found at York Minster, where the designs were drawn on to a specially treated plaster floor in an area known as the “tracing house”. At York the designs were created at full size, allowing masons to use the plans to create stencils for cutting the stones that would form the tracery pattern itself. However, the Binham Priory designs appear to have been accurate drawings that would need to be scaled up by the master mason before they could be used to make templates for the stone cutters. However, though the designs appear to relate to the important West Front, they are not an exact match. The tracery inscription at Binham is subtly


different from the finishedWest Front. Although all the essential elements are present, a number of features, including the angles of the arches, are not what was built. The obvious conclusion is that these tracery inscriptions represent the master mason’s original working drawings for the West Front, showing what he intended rather than what was actually constructed. They are a remarkable example of a work in progress and, as such, appear to be the earliest designs for Bar tracery in England. The discovery of one such design is certainly


important enough to cause a stir. However, after the initial discovery members of the NMGS soon realised that it was not unique. The surveyors identified several other surfaces within the Priory that also contained tantalising fragments of arches and architectural features. To date, the NMGS has identified at least two other large-scale épures within the building, and the fragmentary remains of a third. Binham’s ground-breaking and enigmatic medievalmaster mason may well have left a few other secrets to uncover. The NMGS will be continuing the survey work at Binham Priory throughout this year. 


“Cornerstone” will be reporting in detail on the finds at Binham Priory in the autumn edition.


The Norfolk Medieval Graffiti Survey’s website is www.medieval-graffiti.co.uk


ALL IMAGES: NMGS


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88