This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Balancing Carbon and Ecology.


By Graham Pollard, Balancing Carbon and Ecology project manager, Severn Trent Water


Over the past 20 years, effective regulation of sewage treatment has resulted in the rehabilitation of many Midlands rivers. Watercourses that were once so polluted that even sewage fungus which couldn’t survive in their waters now have substantial fish populations. However, “you get nought for nought”, and the cost of intensifying sewage treatment processes to meet water quality standards has been an increase in power usage, leading to higher carbon dioxide emissions to atmosphere and higher bills for consumers.


Faced with the threat of global warming, sewage companies and the regulator are working together to re-think the difficult balance between carbon emissions, river water quality and cost to consumers.


For many thousands of years, human by-products were dumped on to land or into our rivers, with no particular consideration of the consequences to the


Credit: © Environment Agency Caption: Sewage outfall at Minworth, Birmingham


environment. However, in the UK, increasing population, industrialisation and rapid increases in urbanisation meant that by the mid 1800s the problems created by un-treated waste could no longer be ignored. Filthy urban living conditions, which frequently saw sewage flowing down the street and through the living quarters of the poor, resulted in the spread of fatal diseases such as cholera and typhus - but it was the stink that finally prompted action to deal with the problem.


The Public Health Act of 1875 brought together legislation covering sewerage and drains, water supply, housing and disease. Amongst other measures, it placed an obligation on local authorities to cover sewers, keep them in good condition and supply fresh water to their citizens. They were given power to purchase their local water company, but the lack of standards in both charges and


Working in Partnership We’ve made significant progress in water quality over the last 20 years. The Environment Agency, working with partners, is committed to driving further improvements as part of the Water Framework Directive. Further improvements to water industry discharges will play a significant role in achieving this goal. We’re also keen to take account of other factors, such as climate change and ensure the way we regulate promotes innovation and partnership.


We want to better understand the wider environmental implications of improving water quality Severn T


. We’ve been working in partnership with rent Water on our Balancing Carbon and Ecology programme.


The project has already identified opportunities to reduce carbon while improving water quality


. Our valuable work with Severn T rent Water


will feed into a wider national Environment Agency and water industry project with a broader focus. This includes looking at how controlling pollutants at source could reduce the energy and carbon emissions needed for sewage treatment.


We’re looking forward to continued partnership with Severn T make a difference for people and the environment.


Mark Sitton-Kent Midlands Director, Environment Agency


|62| ENVIRONMENT INDUSTRY MAGAZINE rent Water and others to

Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164