This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Instrumentation • Electronics

Mass InterConnect aims for higher standards with ATML

Automatic Test Markup Language is reaching the tipping point of being adopted by major manufacturers within the ATE industry. Elizabeth Ballester, Jay Guruswamy and Gabriel Roffman report.


or nearly a decade, a group of dedicated individuals has been working to develop a language that allows one to describe much of the information surrounding ATE including testing requirements, test equipment, the unit under test,

test adapters, test stations and even the results from the tests. One of the main goals of this effort has been to streamline

the process of collecting and sharing this information to ultimately make ATE less expensive for everyone involved. Now under the IEEE Standards Coordinating Committee 20 (SCC20), ATML (Automatic Test Markup Language) is reaching the tipping point of being adopted by major manufacturers within the ATE industry.

Common language

The ATML working group has developed this language through a set of XML schema documents. XML (eXtensible Markup Language) provides a mechanism to create a common language that can be used for communication between programs. XML employs schema to define the language through tag sets created by the programmer to organize the data. As one example, the Instrument Description schema

allows one to define all kinds of characteristics of an instrument including physical characteristics like its size, type of data bus (VXI, PXI), types of connectors (SCSI, 9-pin

DIN, etc), positions of the connectors (Front or Back), internal switching paths, hardware capabilities, location of support documents, etc. This standardisation of ATE will reduce product

development overhead and maintenance and repair costs. This reduction would occur through the improvement of test system design by implementing dynamic test sequences that adapt to historical data, supporting instruments and their interface setups, and capturing test information at various test stages. Benefits to the test industry include decreased test times, reduced fault incidents, reduced repair/down time, and formalized capture of historic data. The Mass InterConnect solutions provided by VPC to

the Test and Measurement industry can be described using this standard language which allows further collaboration with the test industry. We at VPC are adopting the ATML schema as the standard language to describe our products. The flexibility of XML, and by extension ATML, enables VPC to extend the ATML vocabulary as needed to accurately define our interconnect solutions, including cable assemblies, connectors, etc. Today the application engineer has to download and study

the connectors on the instrument to design a cable assembly. With the adoption of this standard by the instrument manufacturers, VPC will be able to develop a cable solution more efficiently since the specification will be described in a standard format. The total time spent by the application engineer in

configuring a solution will be greatly reduced which leads to lower costs for our customers. Then, the ATML description of the solution can be provided to the customer enabling easier set-up and integration into a test station plan. The ATML description of the solution can also be used

going forward for help with maintenance. This includes identifying components used in the solution and their associated online support documents. This also includes specifics of the wiring of the solution which can offer many support benefits. These benefits can only increase as adoption of the ATML standard becomes more widespread. l

Enter 22 or ✔ at

Elizabeth Ballester is Marketing Communications Specialist and Jay Guruswamy is Director of Information Technology, Virginia Panel Corporation, Waynesboro, VA, USA. Gabriel Roffman is Chief Technologist eTesters, Verona, VA, USA. For more information about the ATML working group,

22 Fig. 1. Model of the Instrument Description Element in ATML.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60